The Tramp Social Stamp

Silent comedy commentary given a voice.

The Tramp and Deviance

 

The word “deviance” reminds me of the punk-emo-rock phase of the 90’s. Bands like Paramore, Green Day, and My Chemical Romance permeated the dedicated teenage rocker crowd. So moving were their blunt, angry, and head-banging lyrics to teens of the time, that they dressed like the bands and emulated their “my-parents-don’t-get-me” vibe in what some would call deviant behavior. Heavy makeup, “scene” hair, and tight jeans were hallmark looks of the time. I myself am terribly guilty of straightening my fringe till it pointed, insisting on jagged layers and black eyeliner. In public, people would scoff and roll their eyes at my friends and I. The look in their eyes told us we would grow up to be deviant young adults addicted to drugs, sex, and rock and roll. Later, many of these kids would be taking drugs; ones that were perfectly legal. Far from our anti-establishment rock, we would become institutionalized under the psychotropic system of anti-depressants, anti-anxiety medications, and ADHD pills.

Deviance in the form of the emotional rollercoaster of the teen and young adult year struggles has become highly medicalized. What before was simply the social and emotional clumsiness of growing up in a world of contradicting issues and expectations has become mental illness. Young discovery evolved from “typical” teenage rebellion to mood-disorders and chemical imbalances. This is not to say that mental illness is not serious and rooted in true science. It absolutely is a developed science and indeed very serious. However, every behavior outside of the norm (fluid between families, classes, ethnicities, cultures, countries, and individuals) has the tendency to be diagnosed. Much like Chaplin’s Tramp, people are navigating complicated worlds inside and outside themselves. In every Tramp film, Chaplin’s comedy comes from his character’s struggle. He falls, fails at jobs, experiences depression, fright, and anxiety. We laugh because he is our deviance, our failures of perfection and normality. In some instances the Tramp even becomes a criminal deviant. Today’s bio-medicalization tells us that because he has committed a crime, he must be mentally ill. In Modern Times, he steals bread because he is hungry and ends up jail. His condition of poverty caused him to step outside of the law: a poverty caused by the Depression, a social factor outside of himself. Other characters shake their heads at him; he must be crazy, they say.

Today thousands of people take psychotropic drugs, in both mandatory settings in prisons and hospitals along with the greater institution of society. Most of these prescribed drugs are associated with “deviant” mental illnesses used to control undesirable behaviors. ADHD medications translate into control of immaturity, outbursts, and active energy. Instead of looking at school environments, parenting methods, or social trauma, medicalization of this behavior perpetuates the thought that deviant behavior is caused mainly my mental illness. There is something wrong with you.

Depression and Anxiety in my life have been viewed in the same manner. I am not opposed to the science of mental illness. I understand that I was likely born with a predisposition to anxiety because my mother had a stressful pregnancy. I understand that I showed anxiousness and sadness as a young child before many of the extreme traumas in my life. However, the social stigmas surrounding me and the make-up of the consumerist and perfectionist society I personally grew up in, highly influenced my depression. I got tested in every way possible. When they could find nothing physical wrong with me, doctors chalked it up to chemical imbalances and sent me to a psychiatrist. This led to an addiction to Lexapro and Xanax. Lexapro, an anti-depressant, is one of the more popular and more mild of the approved drugs. Xanax is a highly addictive anti-anxiety medication. After I took bottle after bottle in just a weeks time and called begging for more, my doctor put me on a program to wean me off of Xanax forever. Detox was miserable. I shook, vomited, screamed, and cried for weeks; all while trying to maintain my school and keep my job. I was no better than when I began.

According to Pew Research, when it comes to mental illness, only 19 % of those surveyed agree that American is making progress is dealing with the issues. 35% say we are losing ground in our “war”.  These were the most pessimistic results of questions on many health issues including cancer, smoking, and obesity.

Instead of looking into therapy or environment related issues, my depression and anxiety was seen as “abnormal”. I must be ill if I am unhappy in America. I propose that we take medicalization with a grain of salt rather than 10 mg of Prozac. As our definition of deviances changes (as it will) over the decades, let us look to our minds and our environments for clues to mental deviance. Americans take pride in their freedom, but seem to have no freedom to feel. For the Tramps of the world, I wish them therapy instead of the entropy of masking the symptoms of living in a complex and modern world.

[The Tramp and the eating machine. This scene is a comedic demonstration of how things are fed to us by society, even with unpredictable results}.

This is Your Mind on American Media

Lets not mention the Kardashians. Kim’s perfect makeup and grand, luscious sit-biscuit get enough bandwidth. I’m talking about the media that we look toward for the facts and events; the news. News in any form has been used to manipulate, convince, and educated the public since its inception. The Federalist papers influenced our Constitution. War propaganda fixated us on “Victory Gardens” and “Victory Cabbage” during World War II. Uncle Sam pointed to us to join. He wanted us. He wants us now. Media begs us for our attention. Some of it seeks to educate us; to raise issues that deserve a good talking about. Some of it has become the world gossip.

Let me admit first that this is media. You read from the typings of a bitterly disillusioned student, learning to fight her way through thousands of articles and facebook posts to the real nitty gritty. Truth is, I wanted to be a journalist (I also wanted to be a ballerina, astronaut, and President of ‘Murica). In high school I was on the editing staff of both the newspaper and the literary magazine. I gritted my teeth as our meager newspaper published watered down story after watered down story. It left a bad taste in my mouth, like Gatorade that’s sat too long in the car. I found solace in the magazine. We published raw short stories and clever poetry, left for the interpretation of the reader. Holding a socially relevant poem in my hands was like a cold soda. It sizzles and pops with clarity.

Before the publishing of one newspaper issue, I demanded we write an article on Marijuana. We did. The school censored it and threated us with budget cuts. My teacher blanched under the pressure and instead we published another fact-less opinion article by my rival editor. I took my Marijuana article and made a rogue one-pager of a paper. My mother drove me to Kinko’s were we made hundreds of copies. She dropped me off at school the next day with a proud smile. “Show em'” she said.

I lathered the cafeteria tables with it, pasted it in bathrooms, and distributed them secretly through my close cohorts, students and arts teachers alike. I was pulled aside, reprimanded, my graduation threatened. I was discouraged from ever doing such a thing again. A week later, another student published a rogue  paper.  And so it went on, and the single-pager competed with the traditional paper for months. Yet, the traditional and official paper was always more popular, though the articles were simple and full of superficial little stories. “Why“- I’d always ask myself. I got angry. I looked up the ratings for the Kardashians versus the Science Channel and saw that the same thing happened outside the realm of a 2,000 strong suburbia high school.

I started taking  Social Issues and Social Work classes in college and saw media’s role in the history of the world. Everything is propaganda: good or bad, depending on your personal interpretation. Psychology has afforded us use of advertising methods that appeal to certain demographics. Every piece of media is selling: a product, an opinion, a “look”, an ideal. The same principal applies to our news. The information we receive is in a package already. It is the colorful box design of the new health bar; the thing that makes you pick it up and take a look.

According to Pew Research, of the U.S. adults who get news on at least one of the top five social networking sites  (Facebook, Twitter, Youtube, Google Plus…), 85% get news from just one site. The psychology of Facebook alone is a book to be written. The point is, most people are only looking one place for their news, and that one place has a lot of influence over what they see and how they see it. I am very pro-cat video as far as Facebook goes. But I raise a brow at seeing police brutality videos coupled with raging young friends, re-posting from a known left-winger site. I pause and gawk at Obama bashing sessions, courtesy of Fox news. The thing is, I have a diverse group of friends on Facebook, but I will admit that I have voted some people off my newsfeed island. According to Pew data, right-wingers are more likely to befriend right- wingers. Liberals are more likely to “unfriend” or “block” non-liberals though they may initially befriend them. This customizable nature allows us to see what we want to see, and only what we want to see, Truth or not.

Good: We get news we care about and have a more pleasant scrolling experience.

Bad: Social Media sites collect data on what we view and cater biased (or high paying) news links. This allows a variety of social issues to perpetuate themselves. Now, this may seem “doom-and-gloom” but what happened at my high school in terms of censoring our media, happens online as well. Your favorite social media sites are censored by your data and by the highest paying bidder for your viewership. Is this a form of social control? Perhaps.

At times, I cannot help but wonder what these constant doses of propaganda will do to us. My mind goes immediately to history’s greatest propaganda master, Hitler.

In Chaplin’s film, The Great Dictator, Chaplin plays Hynkel. Hynkel is an obvious imitation of Hitler. In one famous scene, Hynkel delivers a speech in gibberish, shouting, and at times making hilarious nonsense noise. Every gesture is passionate, silly, intense, and enthralling. It gives us the impression that whatever he is talking about is something we need to pay attention to. He is the leader. Everyone salutes him. Everyone listens to him and cheers, though he is spouting nonsense. This is your mind on most American media. We have become to used to the cadence of our news anchors. In our minds, as the news plays as the background noise in our homes, bars, and on our radios, what they say is truth. Most of us can recite the introductions to their news special and to the diamond commercial that always plays after.

Americans are certainly not mindless sheep. However, I feel that the lack of questioning I see on our most popular social sites should raise a few brows. If there is one thing I’ve learned from mind-blowing disillusionment, it’s that we must listen to everything with a critical ear and learn to tune out the gibberish.

 

 

Color Me Fostered

In 1921, this scene from The Kid, brings tears to eyes everywhere.

Chaplin’s Tramp character is the adoptive father of an abandoned baby, raising him five years on the streets before things start to go awry.

The enemy here is the system. The Tramp does a stand-up job caring for the kid the best he can in nearly abject poverty. Yet, forces are constantly trying to separate them. For a social work major, this film is a fist clincher.

Let’s get one thing out of the way; social workers do not take children away from their parents. This job, DFACS as it is called in Georgia, does not require a social work degree, and it is certainly not what many social workers aspire to do. The goal, in any case, is to protect children from abuse and neglect. Ideally, children are held temporarily while social workers provide necessary resources and therapy for the parents and the child. The ultimate goal is called “reunification”. The child would be reunified with the parent, both having the skills and communication necessary to live in a decent quality of life. The goal is the skip-happy ending of The Kid; child and biological mother are reunited, and the Tramp gets to live with them in a luxurious home.

Though Chaplin’s slapstick waltz through the streets is lighthearted and lovely, it mirrors a very dismal reality. Poverty and children are as intertwined in the U.S. as they are in rural countries of Africa or some gang studded South American cities. You can virtually “adopt” a big-eyed, bloat-bellied child in Africa right from the convenience of your cell phone; money you will not miss will go towards their education and basic needs. This idea is fine, but the execution perpetuates the illusion that children are only poor in “‘other” places. The child poverty rate for Metro Atlanta is greater than 25 %. And in some parts of Georgia it is greater than 40% (Child Poverty Rates in 2012, according to patchworknation.org). It walks hand in hand with the stigma associated with the current foster care system. Media portrays foster care as a system that cannot win. In the public’s eyes, it fails to rescue children from horrific mistreatment while also stealing children from capable mothers. In a 2013 article from the New York Times, four children are taken from a mother and “plunged into the vortex of the foster care system”. In this article, the “revolving cast” of “unresponsive” social workers fail to express the goal of reunification. A troubled mother loses her children, does not receive therapy or attention from the system, and her children are adopted successfully by another family. In 2014, another article details the terrible abuse and death of a young boy. The boy was involved in an open social work case. Here, as in many other sensationalized tragedies, questions are raised. * How does this happen?

As in Charlie Chaplin’s The Kid, the system raises its disheveled head as the enemy. The Tramp loves the child; treats him as best he can. Yet, they live in less than ideal conditions and the child becomes ill. What is to be done?

Enter the ethics and basic mantras of social work.
1. Everyone matters
2. Do what is best for the client

These are not static phrases. Their meanings and relevancies shift according to each case. Everyone incudes the reckless undocumented teen who is one theft away from a dead end life. Best places equal priority on emotional status, physical health, education, and community.

Social work and the best answer involve very complex solutions. Each case is different. Stigmas and media move popular opinion towards anger for the system. Everyone matters, and yet you cannot reach 100% success. This is my future career. It involves a lot of acceptance and creative thinking. As I watch The Kid, I smile, laugh, and yet tilt my head at its implications even today. Social work itself is the result of social issues wide and deep across nations. Social work is also viewed as a social issue in itself. Flawed as it is, it is present. Its presence alone helps me straighten my back when I say “I am in school for social work.” Charity? No. Law? No. It is an Asset of society, imperfect as it may be.

 

 

*http://www.nytimes.com/2013/07/07/nyregion/the-girls-who-havent-come-home.html?ref=topics

*http://www.nytimes.com/2014/01/11/nyregion/before-his-death-boy-faced-weeks-of-abuse-officials-say.html

Eating someone else’s leftovers

As I reached for the cold but yet (hopefully) untouched egg roll on my bus tray, I knew with a sinking in my chest that I had stooped there. Hungry on a fourteen hour shift, I scarfed it in three bites before another server could enter the dish pit. The egg roll had come still on its plate from table 41, a couple. They had looked clean enough. No sneezing, no double dipping. The woman had even wiped her hands with a sanitary cloth before eating. I kept justifying the act as I swallowed the last bit of spring vegetable mix, shredded pork and egg that stuck in my throat.

Breakfast hadn’t been an option. The night before I had worked a double at the restaurant (two shifts in one day) and gotten home at 2am. In bed by 2:30 with no dinner. Too tired to cook of course. I woke up as late as possible and even dilly-dallied with the alarm for thirty minutes. My fault, I know. Coffee and out the door, with a piece of untoasted bread. Work at 10:30 am. It’s a double again, straight through, no break, until 12am. During the weekend grind I run on fumes, smiling all the time with “yes, sir” and “yes, ma’am.” I spout recipes, cooking methods, bar pours, and wine pairings like a second language. I chug a to-go cup of water between my sixth round of tables and then take my apron off and snap my bar tools into my belt for the bar night shift. I do a training class for new food runners while tending bar. Another glass of water. A handful of goldfish and a piece of fried chicken from my cook friend “Ponchie” (or ponchito, as I love to call him when I ask for favors in Spanish). I collect my tips from the manager at the end of the night and smoke a cigarette in the parking lot with Tyron, the dishwasher. My eyes burn as I count my money. A bill (100$) for the whole day. Slim pickings for a weekend double. We have entered the post-holiday slow season. I think about the day I have ahead. One more double. Rent due after that (800$), and I’ve barely made half the whole month. Tyron suggests I pick up a shift. Silly, I say, I have class.

Enter stage left, school costs.

I am not one to complain. I am absolutely in love with being a server/bartender/trainer at my current job. However, living off tips working full time, and going to school full time is the tough part. I’ve been called crazy, or simply “young” before. “You can do that because you’re young,” they say. I tense my eyebrows at that, thinking. I think about my back pain from carrying heavy trays. I think about my lack of sleep and responsiveness to my friends. I think about smoking more and more. I think about eating mostly fried foods from where I work. Fancy Chinese is my diet. Cigarettes and the 3am mojito are my church. I measure my exhaustion week by week, and finally, when I am forced to take a sick day for my own sanity (or a test), I worry all the hours away about how much I could be making; how much I need for groceries that I likely will hardly use.

Grocery list:
Energy bars
Cereal
Milk
Oatmeal
Mac-and-Cheese

It was not until I began to read the book Nickel and Dimed, on (not) getting by in America by Barbara Ehrenreigh that I felt utterly jipped by “the industry.” Hospitality that is. Barbara Ehrenreigh temporarily ditched her life and spent nearly a year working minimum wage jobs, starting over in cities with no home and little food.

 I had been taught that hard work for anything was normal. Nothing is free. My grandparents immigrated from Mexico. My father is an engineer. My mother didn’t graduate high school and encouraged me to go much farther than her (now she is currently a Master’s student). So working hard at 2.13$/hour for pennies didn’t get me down at first. I started training to become a server when I was 18, making checks for extra cash and movie money. Now I serve professionally and train others to do so.  I can host, serve, expo, and bartend. I still make 2.13$ (plus tips)* According to the Fair Labor Standards Act, as Ehrenreigh mentions, this is considered “fair” for tipped employees.

Barbara (I will call her by her first name as I do other servers), explored serving in her first chapter. I laughed through the entire chapter. I related to it on such a deep level. I could smell the all-day food-soak in her clothes, and feel her grimace at the thought of unruly guests.  It’s true hospitality can be rewarding and even fun around your work-family. But there are far too many instances in which it is degrading. Just as Barbara demonstrated in her first chapter, I announce myself as Lauren when I greet a bar guest, but am too often called “honey”, “baby”, “girl”, “sweetie”, or god forbid “kid“. I accept these names instead of protesting, worried that my tip will suffer. In Barbara’s case, she works for tips and ends up getting another job; a routine she fails to maintain physically and emotionally. In 1996, she cites, 7.8 million people held two or more jobs. I too tried the two-job method, and then tried even harder to add full time school to my mixture. It failed with a sleep-deprived breakdown in the bathroom of the retail store that served as my second hell.

During my two job and school stint, I watched silent films instead of sleeping, seeking distraction. I bathed myself in the black and white comedies of Chaplin.

In the Chaplin film Modern Times, The Tramp is fired from a secure and monotonous factory job and sent out into the streets. He works several jobs including, waiter, singer, and security guard. All of which fail to keep his genuine interest and support him financially. Entertainment-wise, it is a love story between two city dwellers in poverty. Chaplin loved to entertain, but he was also an intelligent and insightful artist who used his films to portray social issues. Modern Times hit theatres in 1936, during the Great Depression in America. Today, following what some call the Great Recession, the Tramp’s antics still echo some of our most sensitive issues. I’m not talking about the poverty that seems unfathomable to us, but the kind closer to home. The grocery bagger, the aging server, the college student, the hotel maid.

In the film, even middle class status is hopelessly out of reach. To facilitate a happy ending, Chaplin and his love interest run away. This is not a reality for the majority. Barbara pointed out that the struggle damages of poverty are cumulative, no acute. People are resilient. A bad job-less week might not put us completely down. Neither will a couple of back-grinding weeks as a maid. It’s the months and years people spend trying to eat three meals a day that wears them down. A paycheck to paycheck lifestyle is usually all they can muster, and advancing on the mythical economic ladder becomes an impossible dream. The American Dream is my father’s favorite philosophy. Anyone can make it if they work hard enough. Now, as a social work major, I cringe at the Dream. Hard work is a great utility. However, as Barbara showed, many times it isn’t enough. Hard work scrubbing floors in the morning and serving at night doesn’t change the systems in place that smother you in the first place. Yes, people must be willing to work hard and sacrifice in order to “make it”. However, flawed systems like minimum wage (no longer a living wage) do not help this endeavor.

I do not claim to have any solutions. Minimum wage and other issues like it come wrapped in red tape and sociopolitical issues that complicate them beyond a blog post. The empty slogans of corporations and the politics of management and workplace favoritism are only a few. I could like a thousand others from personal experience, most of which Barbara encountered in her study. While Barbara’s study was not all encompassing or perfect in a scientific sense, I believe she reached her point. She touched me personally as Chaplin did.  Chaplin pokes fun at the miseries of poverty. After all, comedy is pain. And we laugh because we’ve all been a Tramp falling our way through the grind.

 

*[A note on tips: Tips are fickle and stressful to live by. Depending on the star rating of the restaurant for which you are employed, tips can be low because price point is low. In my current job I can make anywhere from 200$-600$ a week. For consistent bills, this range is risky. A lot of luck and self-marketing for regulars is required to make it in a restaurant with a fluctuating volume of customers.]

 

Skip to toolbar