William Foster
1/25/16
ENG 1102
Architectural
This article explains what’s architectural exclusion is and why the court system refuses to acknowledge the racial division that is causes. Architectural exclusion is the physical prevention of poorer individuals being blocked from access to richer neighborhoods. Building lower bridges so that public transit buses cannot pass from lower socioeconomic areas to wealthy areas introduces exclusion. There are highways that do not connect the two areas as well as closed off roads and barrier fences. From a judicial perspective, judges casually dismiss discrimination claims/ lawsuits brought against such demographic segregation believing them to be just. These same wealthy judges live in the wealthy neighborhoods that quietly agree with not allowing poorer residents to travel their streets.
Architectural regulations mostly go unseen but are just as powerful as the law that uphold their long standing legislations. The biggest issue with these exclusions and incidental segregations are the fact that most people whether regular citizens or individuals in the justice system have not an idea of the current laws in place that discretely set a socioeconomic and racial divide amongst citizens. Academic law has also proposed the idea that spaces themselves have racial meanings. The author of the article argues that places have racial identities based on their history of or know reputation for excluding. It is known that courts should consider this racial meaning for purposes of racial discrimination claims. The racial stereotypes that are often prejudice and incorrect continue to exist as long as exposure to different cultures withstand.
The denial of the public transit (MARTA) in Atlanta, Georgia is a major example of architectural exclusion. Wealthy residents view providing poor people/ people of color with transportation to their area north of metro Atlanta as presenting an invitation to unwanted noise, crime, and vagrants. But it also prevents those individuals from access to better jobs, shopping, and resources. This traditional way of thinking will forever prolong racism that many Caucasians refuse to acknowledge as still continuing. In cities such as Hamden, Connecticut there once stood a ten-foot high, 1,500 long fence that divides the predominantly white neighborhood from the predominantly black public housing projects. Because of this isolation, the blacks were forced to travel a longer was to any kind of shopping when there was shopping a few miles away on the other side of the wall. These kinds of physical dividers exist all over the United States.
In Atlanta, Georgia officials have over the last decade torn down long standing projects in the city to “clean” the area and revive the city. Well as a result the occupants of these projects were forced out into the surrounding suburbs where there is now a spike in crime in said areas. This does not solve any problems or “clean” the streets. It only moves it from one place to another. This entire article sheds light on the fact that highways aren’t where they are just for transportation, one-way signs aren’t just for over flowing traffic, and dead end roads aren’t just ending for any reason. Until the right individuals in the right positions of law want to change the segregation between wealthy and poor there will always be architectural exclusion.