Black Boxes and GIS for Anthropological Research
In modern archaeological research, some portion of the research will take place in a Geographic Information System or GIS. Whether it’s fully integrated into the project both documenting and directing research, or utilized solely for the archiving of mapped data, there is a GIS. The seeming precision of GIS mapped data, coupled with the ability to calculate complex spatial statistics for research and guidance results in a very friendly environment for black box fallacies. This is the problem of closed source, undocumented analytic software tools being used to conduct research. When a black box is used uncritically, without thought for research design and control the results of the research conducted with the black box can become suspect. Take for example, the issue of analyzing site inter-visibility with a viewshed analysis. This is a common use of this GIS tool in landscape archaeology. By tracing lines of sight the software is able to create a binary map, where a pixel will be recorded as either visible or not visible. Commercial software package ArcMap from ESRI has one set of algorithms for this purpose. The most popular open source GIS, Qgis has a different set of very similar algorithms. The result is that with the same input parameters and data Qgis and ArcMap can produce slightly different binary maps of visibility. Because Qgis is open source, an interested party could very easily examine the source code responsible for the resultant visibility map. None of this is possible with a black box, whether … Continue reading