Artist: Jackson Pollock Date: 1947 Link: Reflection of the big dipper
Formal Analysis: The work is random splatters of paint across a canvas. Your eyes are drawn to the center of the painting by the bright blue shape in the center, you then see hints of yellow and orange surrounding the center giving suggestions of an organic form that you can never make out. The contrast of the bright blue, yellow, and orange to the black adds layers of texture to the painting. The black lines are almost straight showing some non organic form to the painting.
Contextual Analysis: During this time abstract and expressionism was starting and Pollock is considered one of the first. He was painting during the depression so he struggled to make money and relied on government programs for funding.
Unknown author. Jackson Pollock Biography, Paintings, and Quotes, January 2011 Reflection of the big dipper analysis Accessed 26 Feb 2017.
Psychological Analysis: Jackson Pollock continued to strive to gain attention his whole life he never got as a child, from his alcoholic father and his mother who was busy raising his bothers and sisters. He struggled his whole with Alcoholism himself and eventually died because of it. This painting was created during his drip period when he struggled to identify his quality work. He also was struggling to keep his marriage together.
Biography.com Editors. Jackson Pollock Biography . The Biography.com website, January 28, 2015 , Paul Jackson Pollock Bio. Accessed 26 Feb 2017.
This work makes no sense at all to me, the big dipper is a constellation of stars that looks like a dipper. This painting does not even have a shape of a dipper. Maybe the title ‘reflection of the big dipper’ is referring to something else like the tool he used to create this painting. Maybe he used the biggest dipper he had in his kitchen to scope paint out and fling it at the canvas. I believe this painting is about nothing, it is free form created by the artist with no purpose. I do not like this work because it has no intellectual value. I do not see anything in it.
On the other hand people may find this work interesting because of its free form look. To them they may see the big dipper as Pollock was trying to express it. Maybe the randomness of the lines lets the viewer search and find there own meaning in the painting. Maybe others think this is how Pollock saw the big dipper and they now have insight into the artist mind. This allowed them to view what he felt while looking at the big dipper. My opinion still stands I still dislike this painting I still believe it shows nothing and is just some random paint thrown at a canvas.