In reading DeParle I did not find that my perception of the ability of social welfare policy to fight poverty was changed drastically, but more of a new spin was put on it. DeParle told the gritty reality of what many people in America wake up to every morning. I appreciated the frankness of his writing, even if a little caught off guard by some of the more casual references to violence (i.e. when Hattie Mae was raped and ended up pregnant at the age of 12, DeParle, pg. 35.). I found this to be a great parallel with the women’s lives, they dealt with trauma on a regular basis and it was not likely reflected upon anymore than the lines in the book suggest. Although I came a way with a multitude of negative emotions from the book, I was impressed by the women in the book. They were all resourceful in their own ways. Each one of them used their unique gifts to survive in a cold and unyielding world.
With regards to what would be the most advantageous route to combat social policy, I have to say I am at a loss. My first thought was education. I inferred that education could certainly help people to have greater job opportunities, more likely a job they would enjoy and also financial gain. I then did some research about this angle and found that in the end, it is not much help. DeParle wrote an article for the New York Times online in which he follows three Mexican-American women from high school graduation to their mid-twenties. All three graduated high school with stable grades and acceptance to great schools. Four years alter, none of them have a college diploma, all are in debt and only one is still in school (New York Times-DeParle). The article further goes on to discuss some of the possible reasons for why this happens. In general, low-income students feel the need to help out at home, they don’t have a strong support system and even if they don’t help out at home they must still support themselves completely.
I like that you pointed out the “frankness” of DeParle. I think he definitely gets straight to the point and writes in a very truthful way instead of trying to sugar coat anything.
I also wanted to say that if someone were to ask me the best way to combat poverty, I would also say education. Your example obviously proves that education is not always the best route, however. I think that traditional education may not be the answer, but maybe just “life” education. For example, better sex education programs (I know going to school in southeast GA I didn’t really have sex ed at all!) or self-esteem and money-management. I know these things already exist in some places and to some extent but maybe we should spend more time on them, particularly in middle school and then continue it through highschool. This may not be the answer either, but I will always believe education of some sort can have a significant impact on lives of young people.
This is a very thoughtful post and well done. My only observation is that you don’t talk about the liberty/welfare trade off at all. I think you raise some very good questions about the difficulty in finding the solutions to poverty. (BTW – that’s combat poverty, not social policy). Education is complicated with young people and gets even more so with adults.