The American Nightmare: The Story of Yank

GSU: ENGL 3860

February 16, 2015

The American Dream conjures images of a hard working person being able to move up in the economic ladder. Starting from nothing and being able to “pull yourself up by your bootstraps” in order to make something of oneself the common rhetoric that is bottle fed to Americans. Same can be said of the character Yank in Eugene O’Neill’s play The Hairy Ape. Through this character’s development the audience is able to watch what happens to a person once they are within the grip of naturalistic circumstance. Play goers bare witness to the downfall of an everyday man who is working hard to make his life better, and no amount of work he puts into trying to find his place in the world he will ultimately fail because the natural world is against him.

The story of Yank is like that of many people; he is proud of being who he is and the work that he does. Yank is a very proud, almost hubristic, man who has considered his work as a fireman is what allows him to belong to a group. He in fact has considered himself a very vital part of the group of firemen that work on the Transatlantic Liner as shown in the beginning of scene one:

“I’m steam and oil for de engines; I’m de ting in noise dat makes yuh hear it; I’m smoke and express trains and steamers and factory whistles; I’m de ting in gold dat makes it money! And I’m what makes iron into steel! Steel, dat stands for de whole ting! And I’m steel—steel—steel! I’m de muscles in steel, de punch behind it!”

Belonging to a group of people with a common goal is most likely due to the fact that he grew up in a rough environment. With an abusive father and a mother who suffered from “tremens,” Yank was raised within a poignant circumstance that he later ran away from once his mother passed away. When he did find a group to be with Yank made sure to give his all to it. Yank even sheds his true name, Bob Smith, and his religious upbring to live and work alongside these other firemen on a Transatlantic Liner. He has taken on a new persona of the strong, tough guy in charge of his life when, in reality, he is only the lowly worker who shovels coal with other men of uneducated status.

These fellow laborers of Yank even talk about their hellish life style. One such character is Long, “’E says this ‘ere stinkin’ ship is our ‘ome. And ‘e says as ‘ome is ‘ell.” Yank is working and living in hell-like conditions, but he doesn’t realize that anything is wrong even when the other workers complain. The death of the American Dream, or what I have likened to the American Nightmare, comes when Yank is hit in the gut with the shovel of class awareness in scene three.

His nightmare started when the character Mildred appears in the engine room and fainted at the sight of the laboring men. She, a woman of high class who is also stuck in her own cultural identity as is Yank, screams for the engineers to take her away from the filthy beast [i.e. Yank]. Do notice that, though Mildred could easily be seen as an antagonist to the ‘hero’ of Yank, the two of them share in the fact that they are both characters within a naturalistic play. In such they are unable to control their situation in life because they are both stuck in their cultural identity and both of them are unable or unwilling to shed their view of the world. Mildred is the rich girl who refuses to change out of her white dress even after being told several times that she should, and Yank is unwilling to wash the coal dust off his skin.

Instead of washing himself, as though he ever does, Yank has a “tink” over what Mildred screamed when she fainted. This ‘tink’ makes Yank more and more enraged that he was called a filthy beast, and the men also have likened him to an ape. Yank’s ape-ness is seen through his animalistic tendencies that are listed through the stage directions: He is fierce, he barks, he snarl[es], he roars. The list of his stage directions from scene one through scene four have painted the image of a grimy, ungainly, and grating sort of man. He yells at his men, makes fun of them for not being as strong, he is prideful, and he is happy. That is until his happiness is shaken by one small, white-dress-wearing girl.

When he realizes that there are people who look down on him, call him an animal, people who do not see him as an equal Yank becomes very angry. He lashes out saying that he will show that girl her place toward the end of scene four:

[Enraged.] Yuh tink I made her sick, too, do yuh? Just lookin’ at me, huh? Hairy ape, huh? [In a frenzy of rage.] I’ll fix her! I’ll tell her where to git off! She’ll git down on her knees and take it back or I’ll bust de face offen her!

He is so angry he rushes for the door so he can track her down and, in layman’s terms, beat her up. Yank doesn’t know how to handle someone looking down on him. This could be a steaming back to his abusive childhood where he was always looked down on by his father, whom from which he ran away from, and has never had to deal with that type of situation again until now. This small woman has made him infuriated, and if she wants to see him as an animal then he’ll act like one. Yank then had to be held down by his fellow workers to make sure he didn’t really go after Mildred for fear that he would rip her apart like an animal.

Three weeks later, or scene five, Yank has cooled down enough that he agreed to go with Long off the Transatlantic Liner and to go adventuring around the clean cut area of Fifth Avenue. This is where the audience is given more back story on Yank. We’re told that he was forced to go to church on Sunday, even though his parents never went, and he was beaten by his parents every Saturday if they were not beating each other up. He says that this is where he learned to “take punishment,” and O’Neill adds in stage notes beside this line “[With a grin and a swagger].” At this point in the play the audience has identified that Yank is not only a hard working man who has a problem with aggression, but now we see him as someone trying to live for something more than what his parents provided for him. He is trying to live his life to the American Dream motif that if you work hard and keep on going there will be a reward for all your hard work. O’Neill, if the stage directions are followed correctly, has made more than a big, mean guy. Instead he has created the model of the all American Man who wants to do more for himself, and in Yank’s case he has done better for himself. He has a job and a group of men who look after him. Yank has made a life for himself, but once he realizes that there are other people out there that look down on his style of living Yank becomes angry and demanding to see how they live.

Leading back to the scene on Yank and Long walking along Fifth Avenue. Yank, who has not changed out of his working clothes and still has soot on his skin, looks very different in comparison to his friend Long, who has changed his clothes in order to blend in more. Yank started to feel a pain within him as he looked around the “too clean” street, and he wanted to leave to find a more suitable place for himself. Too a reader or playgoer it is strange that Yank is so in the dark about his own social class, but it is interesting to see that he still feels this invisible boundary. These feelings are made evident through his anger at Mildred for calling him a beast, and now he feels very uneasy being in a place that is so clean and to him unnatural.

As they walk Long explains that he wants to show Yank that Mildred is ‘on’y a representative of ‘er clarss.’ She is behaving how the other half live. This appears to unfazed Yank who is more amazed than angered, as Long is, that there are people buying jewelry that could feed a starving family for a year.  Yank acts like a kid in a toy store and is hoping from one shiny thing to another, and then he lands on a monkey skin coat that costs $2,000. Yank is like many people who look around at all the things that our society can provide. That is as long as you have the wealth to pay for it. Right then, in this moment of wonder for Yank, that Long makes his case with, “They wouldn’t bloody well pay that for a ‘airy ape’s skin—no, nor for the ‘ole livin’ ape with all ‘is ‘ead, and body, and soul thrown in!”

Long wants Yank to understand that they are being taken advantaged of and that Yank should be angry for that reason. He is trying to get Yank to understand the frustration that he, Yank, and the other workers feel are the same feelings. However this seems to have a stronger effect on Yank than Long realizes and Yank, as the stage direction indicate, takes the skin in the window as a personal insult. This insult is strengthened when the stage is then crowned with rich people coming out of church and they never make eye contact with Yank or acknowledge his existence. Not being seen makes Yank act out and he confronts a man walking by and he demands to know if this man believes that he owns the place. The man responds with a, “I beg your pardon.” Yank’s anger builds the more people surround him and women moon over the monkey fur in the window.

Yank tries to follow Long and keep a cap on his anger , but it is when Yank sees a man running for a bus that he lets out his anger and punches the man in the face. From the context of the stage directions it appears that Yank thought the man was getting into a fight and in delight to join in he throws a punch. These actions are very similar to how an animal in an uncomfortable situation will strikeout without apparent warning. The stage directions also lead the reader or actor to believe that this character is a spring under a lot of pressure and is about to jump at any point. Yank is a man with impulsive urges that makes readers and playgoers sit on the edge of their seats to see what he will do next. He is literally a caged animal wandering around a hierarchical world of the American Nightmare that is not going to forgive him for being himself. After this incident, which left the man unshaken but angry, landed Yank in prison for the next scene.

When Yank wakes up in his cell he believes that he is in the zoo and he looks around hearing several different voices of prisoners. The other men start asking questions about what landed Yank with them, and he tells them about Mildred and how she didn’t belong in their world but in a window display. The prisoners believe that Yank is a nutter, but like to hear him anyway. Yank explained that he was in a fight and the judge told him to have a ‘think’ in the prison for a few days. Through talking Yank realizes that it is he that he isn’t understood anywhere ,and when one prisoner told him about the I.W.W. (the Industrial Workers of the World or “Wobblies”) Yank asks for the newspaper that explains that those people are all about. Yank sits and, though he cannot read very well, he manages to realize that the man that he has been working for is the man who made the steel bars that he is now en-caged in.  Yank begins to piece together class structure and that he is working for the man who has en-caged him both physically and metaphorically. He has been worked to death by a man who is trying to keep him in his place, and he is literally behind the steel bars that he makes too. Yank again flights into a rage and bends the bars as the guards yell at him. The next event is unclear because the curtain drops and all the audience can tell is that someone screams.

In scene seven Yank is out of prison and wants to join the I.W.W. to help stand up to his boss. At first it appeared that Yank had finally found his place, had finally found a group that will accept him, and treat him right. Unfortunately Yank, because of his nervous behavior, is thought to be an informant for the government and he is thrown out of the office. A police officer comes up on the scene in time to see the scuffle and Yank defeated on the ground. Yank realizes that he doesn’t belong anywhere, and that it is not his fault. It is the fault of cultural identity that has forced him into a small cage and that his only crime is being born. All Yank wants is to be apart of something, anything; however when he asks the police officer where to go from here man tells him, “Go to hell.”

The final scene we follow Yank to the zoo where he makes his way to the money house. At this point Yank is in a very low and bitter state. All he wants is for someone to talk to, so he goes to the animal that he keeps being referred to: A Hairy Ape. Yank contemplates how he and the gorilla are alike in many ways. They don’t belong and are stuffed into cages for people to point, stare, and be scared of them. That is what separates them from the world. The only problem is that Yank does belong to this world. He belongs with the people and yet they treat him as though he doesn’t belong. Whereas the gorilla knows he doesn’t belong and he has a past to look back on. In this moment Yank decides to help out his ‘Brother’ and let’s the gorilla out of his cage so that the two of them can be together and form their own group.  Yank wants to show the gorilla human ways so they can be outcasts together. When Yank goes to shake the gorilla’s hand the gorilla grabs Yank and crushes him in a ‘murderous’ hug.

To conclude on the character development of Yank is that Yank is more like the everyday man than even he realizes. This is to be concluded only because in the last scene, even though Yank has finally found someone that he can identify with, he mocks the gorilla. He mocks the gorilla just as the people in Yank’s life mock him. He really is the everyday man who starts as a prideful man, who moves to anger, who moves to trying, who ends in bitterness. Since Yank is trying to live in accordance to the American Dream he is really living out the American Nightmare. His personality starts out large and prideful, and through the course of the play it becomes smaller and smaller; it is as thought his personality is crushed down and he keeps going until his body is literally crushed like his hopes. The purpose of these dashed hopes is that people do not have control over their lives and we cannot break out of our cultural identity no matter how hard we try because it is just part of the naturalistic order of our society. Crush or be crushed.

Works Cited:

O’Neill, Eugene. “The Hairy Ape.” Project Gutenberg. Project Gutenberg-tm EBooks, 4 June 2009. Web. 10 Feb. 2015. <http://www.gutenberg.org/files/4015/4015-h/4015-h.htm>

Response 3: Public Event and Location

GSU: ENGL 4320

February 21, 2015

For my busy schedule I don’t get to go to many events. So, for my event I decided to go out with my mom for dinner at Maguire’s Pub down the street from my house, because they normally have live music. This is a usual meeting place for everyone in town for this reason. Also, I believe at any point when you can get a free meal that’s an event.

Maguire’s Pub has larger than what most people would expect as they descend down the new, but rustic stairway. There is a heavy, mahogany door with iron work handles that belongs more on a large house than it does as a restaurant opening. Through the door there is a counter on the left side where a teen-aged waiter will show your group to a table. The area has dim, orange lighting that makes the atmosphere inviting to sit down and talk over pretzel sticks and mustard sauce.

The sounds I heard from our table were mainly background noises, and at the time nothing really stood out to me aside from the high-pitch reverberation from the speakers being setup. That came up a little at the beginning and ending of my recording so TURN THE VOLUME DOWN. You have been warned. The reverb wasn’t as loud in the restaurant, but it was very loud in the recording.

Within my recording the sound is a lot more claustrophobic than my real experience. It was a very peaceful dinner with several people having chats between one another. There was one man on the recording that was louder than the children who were playing at the far end of the pub. Yes, this is a “family friendly” pub. Who says you can’t have a beer or wine with dinner when your kids are around?

The sound of all of the talking, the kids playing, the waitress asking if everything was okay, and, yes, even the reverberation every now and then I found very relaxing. It became a steady hum in the background. I really enjoy going to this pub with friends and family when we just want a place to sit and have drink over dinner. It reminds me of group events I would go on with friends and family. There would be food and a slight hustle and bustle.

It’s odd, because when I was younger, well before my time at college, I wouldn’t be comfortable in situations like this: too many people, doing to many things, and not being able to hear what was being asked of me because of all of the background noise. These things would make me feel too smothered and would send my senses into overdrive.

Now it reminds me of dinner my first year of college. Everyone on campus would come together and get food. There would be talking over the table, and across the room. There would be people going to and from different areas of the dinning hall as music would be pumped in through the speakers. Maybe that is why I really enjoy Maguire’s Pub. It has become a meeting place of the town to hear and talk between people.

Critical Response Essay: My Senior Wrap-up

While compiling this exit portfolio I have learned a lot about myself as a writer and a student. Since I am a transfer student I have a couple of writing samples from different disciplines, and the different types of assignments has allowed me to find my strengths and weaknesses. I have mainly found my niche as a rhetorical writer through my experiences at Georgia State University. For my seven works I will order them in chronological order from my time at Young Harris College to Georgia State University to show how I have changed as a writer.

My first work, and my oldest artifact, is Expressions of American Modernists. I wrote this essay while at Young Harris in the spring of 2010 in my American Literature class when I was an English major. In being my first work it is clearly my worst and through my rereading I have found so many things that should be changed. For one thing it doesn’t have a thesis. It does have an interesting theme, but there can’t be an argument or any sense within the essay without a thesis. After the first sentence the audience, who at the time were my classmates and professor, would be left confused as to my meaning behind the work. The assignment was to show my understanding of American poetry of the Modernist Movement; a section of the course that we were reviewing at the time. From this assignment I did learn about the techniques employed by the authors to show the modernist aesthetic. From rereading this work I have learned that I should not try to pack too many ideas into a small paper, for each of these ideas haven’t had enough explanation to be fully flushed out.

My next artifact that I have named How Much Is Too Much, was written while I was studying Communication at Kennesaw State University in the spring of 2012. This work is very different from my other works because this was a journalism assignment where I was to obverse my subject and portray them through the writing. It was meant to help me understand that the people within journalist stories were as much a characters as those within fiction, and I must pay attention to the details of what is fully happening in order write a good story for readers. From this exercise I gained the knowledge that the story is within the details. My audience was the students of KSU campus, because I was aiming to shed light onto the topic of depression on the campus. One thing I would change is the transition from storytelling to being informative within this work. It sounds like a transition used on Dateline between the story and a commercial.

From shedding-light-on-to, and the fact that this is chronological, leads me to my next artifact called, Between Us and the Night Sky. This paper was a compilation of research on the topic of light pollution for my spring 2012 environmental writing class. This was a really fun paper because I was able to compile my own research and interview both professors and leaders within the field itself; finally a step away from my journalistic writings and more active research. I wrote this essay for the general audience because my aim was to make this information, that isn’t really thought about, better understood. Granted now I understand that aiming for a wider audience would result in changing how I wrote this information. I would rewrite this for a blog or a forum on a public website in shorter, scan-able ways, and not as a research paper. This compilation of information could be used for a presentation on the topic to create change because it has additional information about exchanges in behaviors that can be easily accomplished. However, this paper would never reach its intended audience in this state.

After taking a year off from my education I transferred to Georgia State University in the spring (note my running theme of spring time) of 2014 where I took a Medieval Literature class and my final paper was, Evolution of the Folk-tale Plot: Analysis of Beowulf and Piers Plowman. This essay was another research paper that I felt was written in a much better format than my previous research paper. There are a few changes I would make within the word choices I made which is namely this statement, “The name “folk-tale” when broken down really [literally] mean[s] a tale for the folk.” Even in the most basic of sentences I have to pay attention to the structure of the sentence in order to convey my meaning without confusing the readers. One critic that I most likely will receive from this paper this the breaking up of the comparisons between these two folk-tales, but I much rather the format I used stylistically because it makes the paper easier to read in an eight and a half by eleven format.

My most favorite paper to write was, “Bass” to “Buns”: How Music Videos Affect the Feminist Movement which I wrote when I was in Intro to Rhetoric and Advanced Composition in spring 2014. I believe that I took to this paper more because of the subject matter of feminism and pop culture. I took ahold of this topic and expanded upon the assignment requirements so that I could also use this paper as my writing sample for graduate applications. Since I have been working so hard on this topic personally I plan to make revisions. I plan on the audience to be other researchers of this topic and hope to have it published in a pop culture journal after it has had a lot of polishing. One thing I would like to reevaluate is the terminology used by Trainor within the context of the “Skinny Bitch” and compare it to Minaj’s use of the same term. Then I want to reestablish the connection between the false feminine body empowerment as a passing fad to the demeaning of women as shown in the “Literally I Can’t” video.

Next up, I have my Soundscape Response from my Senior Seminar from which I have been learning how to perform rhetorical responses through the use of soundscapes. This writing is, again, from a spring semester 2015. This has been a great recurring instruction of paying attention to more than what is going on in front of you. From this assignment I was able to realize that something as simple as sounds can create both a story and responses within the listeners. It also reminded me that my reaction isn’t the reaction of those around me when they are hearing the same soundscape. This assignment gave me a healthy dose of the differences between people and the importance of the audience within the writing process.

My most recent work is my final artifact named: A Letter through Poetry: A Close Reading of “To Wordsworth.This was also written in the spring semester and it was written for a literary audience. Though it was a literary class and audience, I feel that the use of language is still within the context of rhetorical understanding of the work. I am still waiting on getting this paper back from the professor to tell me if there are any contextual problems within my work.  I really do rely on professors to be critical of my writing in order for me to produce better work. I really appreciate that GSU professors are so critical in reviewing their student’s work because it offers me an opportunity to improve my work currently and to have something to pay attention to later on.

My writing has changed over the years to take more information into account than just writing down what I expect the teacher wants to hear. Over the years, I have come to understand that I must write for my peers for it is us who are going to make the changes if there is one to be made. For this reason I have to also take into account how to write for these audiences and how to best reach them on both an accessible and a personal level. My ideas on what constitutes “good writing” has also changed because I have been made aware through my rhetorical classes that everyone is trying to use rhetoric in some shape or form. From this I have learned to be more critical observer of what is being communicated to me and for what purpose.

Overall what I have learned as a writer and researcher is to take my time and to allow the message I want to convey to create the framework to work off. To structure my arguments per the evidence if you will. By determining my audience I will better be able to focus my work in order to establish a thesis and argument. Through my work within Practical Grammar I have also learned, most importantly, to take my time with my words and understand how they are used in order to convey my meaning. Rhetoric can be twisted with the simple change of a letter within the English language and words themselves should be regarded with respect before typing them onto a page.

 

A Letter through Poetry: A Close Reading of “To Wordsworth”

GSU: ENGL 3605

February 19, 2015

Percy Bysshe Shelley

In a close reading of Percy B. Shelley’s poem “To Wordsworth a reader can learn that Wordsworth was more than just a poet of nature. Wordsworth was a voice of truth when his followers needed him within the expansion of the Republican Party within France. When Wordsworth, then, abandons his work later in exchange for a nicer lifestyle Shelley writes this poem in response. The diction of the poem “To Wordsworth” conveys both sadness and bitterness. However, through his playing with the Shakespearian Sonnet form and use of both common and high language Shelley denotes the greatness of Wordsworth. By denoting him Shelley then proves that he and other former followers can move on without Wordsworth.

The poem, in effect, reads like a eulogy at first. There are many moments where the reader believes that the Wordsworth that Shelley is writing about is gone with the ending line, “thou leavest me to grieve… that thou shoudst cease to be” (Shelley lines 13-14). In an initial reading there is a feeling of Shelley reminiscing about what use to be. Wordsworth use to have the same feelings as Shelley did about youthfulness of “childhood and youth, friendship and love’s first glow” (Shelley line 3). These were common emotions felt by Shelley and the Wordsworth of his memory. This Wordsworth was described by Shelley as a “star” who would shine on those who were failing about in the darkness. The past Wordsworth was a refuge” for those who were struggling even while he himself was within “poverty.” The past Wordsworth was about “truth and liberty,” but he has “cease to be.” The old Wordsworth was something to behold in accordance to an initial reading of Shelley’s poem, however this isn’t really the case.

Let’s begin an analysis with Shelley’s use of high and low language between the addressing of Wordsworth and himself. There are nine moments, aside from the poem’s title itself, where Shelley speaks to Wordsworth directly. The poem begins with the address of “Poet of Nature,” which is literally setting this poem up as a letter. It is also establishing Wordsworth as a product of his work and not as a person; we only see Wordsworth as a poet. Also, throughout this poem, Shelley uses words such as “thou,” “thy,” and “thee” in referring to Wordsworth whereas he uses “I,” “mine,” and “me” in reference to himself. This accent establishes a formality between himself and the nature poet who is now a man of ‘high-art.’ This formality is one of class hierarchy because of tone of voice shifting between the reserved term of ‘thou’ and the relaxed term of ‘I.’ Placing formality onto the character of Wordsworth makes him out to be more of someone readers have to look up to instead of someone whom we are inspired by. In contrast, Shelley places himself with the common man by referring to himself within the common diction. Shelley even calls himself a ‘frail bark in winter’s midnight roar,’ which gives an image of someone just floating around in the darkness trying to find light, whereas Wordsworth was the “rock-built refuge” (Shelley lines 8-9).

This changing of the diction between common friends who welt common woes to one of them being called by formal terms is twisting from friend to deserter (Shelley line 13). This can be later seen in the counter-sublime moment of taking the uniqueness of Wordsworth’s sublime poetry and making it into common ideas. Shelley takes Wordsworth’s ideas of “nature,” “childhood,” “youth,” “friendship,” and love’s first glow” (Shelley lines 1-2). These are images used by Wordsworth’s poetry in order to convey the sublime. By stripping away its unique qualities Shelley has rendered Wordsworth’s concepts on the intangible as nothing more than simplicity.

This action is a poetic theory that has been called daemonization by Harold Bloom; where Shelley addresses earlier work of Wordsworth within this poem in order to show the reader how ordinary the previous work really is (Harold Bloom). This aesthetic change from the sublime to the counter-sublime is a shift from the intangible to the tangible within the natural world. Within Shelley’s poem the aesthetic is more toward the real world and helping the people that have been left by Wordsworth than being in awe of the star that Wordsworth once was.

This shift in aesthesis has been made even more propionate because of Shelley’s shifting of the Shakespearian Sonnet. From one reading there was no indication that this poem is anything more than just a sonnet, but from further reading, and more understanding of the daemonization between these two characters within the poem, there can be more understood for the poem’s styling. During this time there were many poets who would use imitation in order to write their poetry. Through this poem Shelley has established that Wordsworth has gone away from shining light onto art and liberty, and has now deserted these pursuits. Through the high and low language that is used by Shelley, it can only be gathered that Wordsworth has given up art for the imitating of being something higher. Shelley mocks this imitation by imitating a Shakespearian Sonnet. Instead of the common, though considered high-brow, rhyme scheme of abab, cdcd, efef, gg Shelley inserts the couplet between the second and third quatrain making the rhyme scheme of abab, cdcd, ee, fgfg. This shift from traditional to contemporary style show a change within the author; a change that he will no longer blindly follow his once northern star into imitation.

This slide away from the imitation can be shown through the great use of punctuation that Shelley displays throughout the poem. In reference back to the opening line of the poem: “Poet of Nature,” the comma indicates that this poem is meant to be seen as a letter to the entitled Wordsworth. At the ends of the poem lines there is a continuation of the initial thought. I say it’s a continuation because I once read that colons should be considered as gateways inviting readers to go on. It is these lack of stopping points are the most interesting within the poem; namely between lines seven and twelve. This is during Shelley’s lament on what Wordsworth was to so many that he, Shelley, got swept up in his recount. There are only colons that invite the reader to keep reading on that reside between these lines. Along with these colors there are also three enjambments that keep the reader going on and on, until a caesura appears at the end of line twelve in the form of a hyphen. Contrarily, the other punctuations where more indications to take a breath and move on it isn’t until this hyphen that the reader gets a break to pause and reflect on what has been stated.

This pause allows the reader to reflect on the twelfth line of the poem: “Songs consecrate to truth and liberty,-” (Shelley line 12). It is reading over this line that left a mark on me as a reader. The song that is being sung to us now is to inspire the reader to look for the, to quote Dr. Matthew Roudané, capital T truth.” We are to look deep into what we are being sung, to pay attention to the star that is leading our bark, before we believe that we are following truth and liberty. Shelley is telling readers that everything isn’t what it seems, and that we must delve deeper before we start explications of truth.

This use of wit in changing the sonnet format coupled with the wit of language Shelley has shown that his not just an imitation of what he followed. This poem is more than just a writer lamenting the loss of someone he holds dear. This poem is about letting Wordsworth, and other readers, know that just because one of their political group has defected to the higher class doesn’t mean that he or the others would do the same. This poem is about one-upping Wordsworth in his strongest area of work; and proving that Shelley is more than the man that he once followed. Shelley may be in morning for the friend that he once had, but he will move on and be better than he once was.

References

“Presidential Lectures: Harold Bloom: Excerpts.” Presidential Lectures: Harold Bloom: Excerpts. Stanford Presidential Lectures and Symposia in the Humanities and Arts. Web. 16 Feb. 2015. <https://prelectur.stanford.edu/lecturers/bloom/excerpts/anxiety.html>.

Shelley, Percy Bysshe. “To Wordsworth.” The Norton Anthology of English Literature, Stephen Greenblatt: 9th ed. Vol. D. New York: W.W. Norton, 2012. 752.

Response 2: Soundscape

GSU: ENGL 4320

February 15, 2015

The soundscape I responded best to was the sounds that surround me every day. I ever realized that I am surrounded by so many sounds especially at different times of the day. During this morning and early afternoon I had heard birds chirping and dogs barking. For the assignment I decided to record some of that sound from a different part of my yard and picked up several different sounds. Take a listen:

I stood in the doorway at the front of my house and had the recorder going. I mainly heard the humming of late afternoon street traffic. It’s a comforting humming of engines and light, though high, squeaking of the brakes. That is until a huge truck, the size of which no one really needs to drive or can pay the ungodly cost of the gas to fuel the beast, came roaring by. Once that monster revs up the hill that is right beside my house there are chirping birds again with the light humming of the other smaller cars zipping by.

There are a couple more layers of my recording. By the eight second mark there is a clanging sound of me locking the front porch door, because my dog decided to follow me around. At one point my voice can be heard telling my dog to stop biting at my shoes as I stood there around the twenty-two second mark. There is the mumbling sound of people going by, but I didn’t see anyone walking by.  Being our town there are people walking about everywhere so they could have been on the other side of the adjoining street and my mic picked it up.

The main sound that I responded to the most is the revving engine. I am a person who really hates that sound when I’m at home. There is a time and a place for everything and in a tiny town there is no need for a land yank to be revving up the hill. It covered up the nice chirping of the birds, and destroyed the nice humming of the other cars.

It is that loud disruption, the non sequitur if you will, of the situation that just irks me. However it is the sounds of the chirping birds that bring me back into the peace of mind of being home. I promise I’m not a neoclassical critic that believes that the unities of plays should be applied to life as well, but jeez do I hate the noise.

However, once the noise has settled I am able to relax both physically and mentally to the song of our finches and the steady humming of the little cars. It’s a reminder that no matter how annoying or bad something is that it will always pass just like everything else in life. It may not be pleasant at first and it may not pass as quickly as an obnoxious truck, but all will be better in due time.

Between Us and the Night Sky

KSU: WRIT 3170

April 30, 2012

I finally saw Saturn’s rings on a crisp, clear night on the overlook of Turtle Rock at the observatory for Young Harris College. Seeing the rings took the power of a Schmidt Cassegrain telescope that is housed in a metal dome at the top of Turtle Rock. The dome could comfortably hold fifteen people.  Unlike in the books that I used to read as a child, the rings didn’t have color to them. They were just wispy strands of white that encircled the large orb. Yet, even without the color it was still amazing to see the planets in real life.

James Madison University Light Pollution Map

On that mountaintop, the sky seemed to go on forever; anyone could just look up and be engulfed with the darkness of the sky. It felt like I could shake hands with both Sirius and Mars that glitter in the sky. Once I moved away from the mountains, and into the suburbs of Atlanta, I have found myself longing to see the stars that have become my close friends.  The sky has a permanent glow that has created a wall between people and the night sky that cannot be broken.

Light pollution has become a problem to many because it is an endangerment to wildlife, it adds more pollution to our environment, it has become a health hazard to us, and this hazard is expensive to maintain to begin with. There are many reasons to get rid of light pollution, yet we are not as aware of it as other forms of pollution. That is, we are not aware of it until the light is shining in our face.

Dark Sky Association president Robert Wagner said that he started his dark night campaign because, “[He] finally had enough of the streetlights shining into my house and bedroom to approach the city of Kansas City about shielding the lights. During this meeting, they [the city hall of Kansas City ] said that these lights were the best and lowest polluting, nothing could be done. So [he] decided to work toward educating the city and pushing for better design and engineering standards for light trespass.”

It is not just the sleepers or stargazers that are taking up issue with all of the light pollution that our developed areas are producing. Along with losing their living space due to the deforestation that comes with development, animals are getting hurt or even killed because of light pollution. Light pollution, according to Wildlands CPR writer Tiffany Saleh, harms all animals because of, “disorientation from and attraction to artificial light, structural-related mortality due to disorientation, and effects on the light-sensitive cycles of many species.”

In his article, that was published in The Times West Virginian, Jake Stump wrote about hundreds of birds that were found dead outside of Tucker County High School in 2008. Stump’s wrote that the school administers shut down the school that day because they believed that the flock had a disease and that is why birds kept flying into the window glass. Then West Virginia Division of Natural Resources spokesperson Hoy Murphy told him that the birds were actually attracted to the lights that the school was emitting that dark, foggy morning: ‘“Migratory songbirds migrate at night and use stars to navigate,” said Hoy, “If stars are obscured by clouds or fog, they will orient to almost any elevated light source to attempt to navigate.”’ These birds died because they got lost in a fog as they were trying to migrate, so when they found a source of light they followed it like they have been conditioned to do for generations. Sadly they got the light pollution mixed up with the stars and died, like many other birds do, because of this mistake.

Not only is light pollution harmful to animals, it is also harmful to people.  For smog sufferers, there has been a new study released, conducted by the Harald Stark of the NOAA’s Earth System Research Laboratory, that shows that night time lights are making the smog in the air worse.  In her 2010 posting for Sky and Telescope magazine, Kelly Beatty wrote about the phenomenon that is changing our atmospheric chemistry:

“People who live in cities know plenty about the harmful effects of smog. They also know that the best time to get fresh air is in the early morning because there are far fewer exhaust-spewing vehicles on the road at night. Atmospheric chemists add to this by noting the cleansing cycle that the air goes through every night. Each night the nitrate radical (NO3), a compound destroyed by sunlight, builds up in the dark sky and neutralizes the nitrogen oxides (NOx). NOx build up is what leads to the ozone (O3) that created the smog. New research shows that this cleansing isn’t as effective as it could be, because the NO3 is being destroyed by the light pollution in the city. Less NO3 means dirty air.”

Basically this article is giving us the simple science behind why night time light pollution is bad for people. Sadly that is only the starter. Damn M. Smith, a writer for General Medicine, posted an article in 2009 about how “Constant Artificial Light Linked to Cancer and Other Health Issues.”  Smith writes about how constant lights messes with our melatonin levels. Melatonin is a chemical that a human body processes naturally when it is time to go to sleep. The body’s natural clock goes by the light of the day; for we are beings that should be up during the day and sleep at night. Smith adds that the lowering of the melatonin chemical leads to the chance of more estrogen hormones rising. Excessive estrogen could potentially lead to a heightened risk for breast cancer. Also without a proper night’s sleep the white blood count drops, and this can open us up to illnesses.

All that talk about health leads us to the last topic of money because we have to spend money on the medicine to combat our illnesses and because we are also the ones paying for the lighting that cause these problems. The Utah Skies organization has posted some information about how much the average person spends for the light pollution that is harming us.

“While the cost to the typical homeowner might be in the $150-250 range per year, the cost to the nation is approaching $10 billion annually.  This is an absurdly large amount of money to waste. Diseases could be studied, the hungry could be fed, our nations children could be better educated,” Utah Skies.

The odd thing about all our lighting problems is that we can change it and make our lighting better: “All of that bad lighting could be redone by replacing the up-pointing 300W halogen bulbs with more efficient LED lights and by pointing the LEDs down, thus cost far less for the taxpayers without causing a single change in the quality of information delivered to the traveler or to compromise their safety. Though with white light LED lights, here too, caution must be used. These lights emit high levels of bluish light that interferes with our night vision,” states a report by the Department of Physics Florida Atlantic University.

Just because there is a need to shut off our lights, there is no need to go into a full blackout every night. There are safety reasons as to why we have road and sidewalk lighting. In the final report of Safety Benefits and Other Effects of Roadway Lighting by the National Cooperative Highway Research Program have reports of car crashes that happen in the day time verses the night time: “In these studies, if the night/day crash ratio is lower in the lighted condition than in the unlighted condition, then a reduction in nighttime crash risk is presumed.” (Rea pg 3)

With all of the statics out there it is reasonable to want to feel safe when driving or traveling at night. To feel make their people feel safe cities will install high power lamps so that we can see at all times of day or night. Yet with these lamps we are still putting ourselves at risk. In our interview Professor Steve Morgan, Instructor of Astronomy and Director of the O. Wayne Rollins Planetarium, noted, “For 40% of those living in the United States their sky is so light polluted that it never gets dark enough, at night, for their eyes to go into ‘night vision’.” Basically he is saying that our eyes are so used to the light population that our natural “night vision” has been skewed and we can no longer see well at night. Granted if we were to leave the areas of light pollution we could trigger our natural night vision.

There are plenty of ways to get these lights dimmed or better directed. For starters we can examine car headlights. Headlight glare can cause other drivers to be temporarily blinded while driving, which puts them and other drivers at risk. To prevent this, there should be a rating system that helps show drivers what are the best head lights to use when out at night. In their study of the equipment that can increase traffic safety, Christopher Flanigan and Michael Flannagan wrote: “The overall effect of a rating system is expected to be an increased emphasis on the importance of seeing distance with low beams. This should result in improvements in safety, primarily in the form of fewer pedestrian collisions.” (Flannagan pg 277)

Even when out on Turtle Rock in Young Harris I could look down and see the cars on the highway and the glow from the restaurant lights. Even in a place, like Young Harris, where there isn’t a major city for miles in any direction there is still small areas that intrude on the night sky’s beauty. The constant glow and hum of the lamps make it hard for observers to see past the light’s glare.

In the suburb Kennesaw there is plenty of light pollution that spread from the capital city of Atlanta. There are many lamps that are designed to look nice yet do not like the walk ways well, many stores that glow like beacons in the night, and homes with light pouring out of the windows at all hours. This lamp post, picture taken at University Place at Kennesaw State University, is an example of nice lamps that do not get the job done. The light should be pointed downward so students can see around themselves as they are walking back from classes at night time. However the design makes it where the light shine at a more diagonal line; which makes it where we will need more lamps to light the sidewalks. With all of the lamps piling on top of one another the light pollution will mount.

Even with all of the negatives of light pollution that constantly surrounds us, there is hope. There are plenty of small steps we can take to make our homes more light pollution friendly, “One thing that we can all do at home is to have shades on any of our outdoor lighting fixtures,” says Professor Morgan. On their website Utah Skies suggests installing motion detectors that turn on lights so that we are not left without the feeling of being secure. The main objective isn’t to go into a blackout every night; that just isn’t sensible. What we should all strive for is to make better lighting choices for our homes and our towns. That way cities can save money, the nation can save energy, the lives of countless animals will be protected, and people can live healthier lives.

Overall, the management of light pollution is all about educating people about the pollution that we emit every night. Without education we all will continue to use up our electricity, shining light out, and not caring about who it affects. Just for one night, it would be nice for everyone to just take a break from everything, turn out the lights, go outside, and look up. Become inspired by what we see “…Starlight vista has been and continue[s] to be an inspiration of the mankind, and that its contemplation represents an essential element in the development of scientific thoughts in all civilizations,” says the International Conference in Defense of the Quality of Night Sky. We all have the right to see the stars—to learn from stars and appreciate them for the beauties that they are in our right.

Bibliography:

Beatty, Kelly. “Night Lights Worsen Smog.” Sky and Telescope: The Essential Magazine of Astronomy 15 Dec. 2010. Print.

“Declaration In Defense of the Night Sky and the Right to Starlight.” Welcome to the StarLight Universe. Star Light Initiative, 20 Apr. 2007. Web. 18 Apr. 2012. <http://www.starlight2007.net/index.php?option=com_content>.

Flannagan, Michael J. , and Christopher Flanigan. “Development of a Headlighting Rating System.”http://www.unece.org. N.p., 31 May 2005. Web. 9 Apr. 2012. <www.unece.org/fileadmin/DAM/trans/doc/2005/wp29gre/gtr8-5e.pdf>.

“Light Pollution Impacts Animals and Environment.” Florida Atlantic University Physics Department. Florida Atlantic University Physics Department, 2009. Web. 18 Apr. 2012. <http://physics.fau.edu/observatory/lightpol-environ.html>.

“LightPollution: It’s Not Just an Astronomer’s Problem.” Web log post. Light Pollution: It’s Not Just an Astronomer’s Problem. Utah Skies Organization. Web. 18 Apr. 2012. <http://www.utahskies.org/lightpollution/NotJustAnAstronomyProblem.html>.http://dawn-m-smith.suite101.com/effects-of-light-pollution-on-human-health-a90051

Packer C, Swanson A, Ikanda D, Kushnir H (2011) Fear of Darkness, the Full Moon and the Nocturnal Ecology of African Lions. PLoS ONE 6(7):e22285.  doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0022285

Photograph. Tumblr. Web. 18 Apr. 2012. <http://30.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_lkkaxp7Wu21qbgzv1o1_500.jpg>.

Rea, Mark S., John D. Bullough, Charles R. Fay, Jennifer A. Brons, John Van Derlofske, and Eric T. Donnell. Onlinepubs.trb.org. Rep. no. Project No. 5-19. American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, June 2009. Web. 15 Apr. 2012. <http://onlinepubs.trb.org/onlinepubs/nchrp/docs/NCHRP05-19_LitReview.pdf>.http://www.unece.org/fileadmin/DAM/trans/doc/2005/wp29gre/gtr8-5e.pdf>

Saleh, Tiffany. “Effects of Artificial Lighting on Wildlife.” Road RIPorter 12.2 (2007). Print.

Stump, Jake. “Hundreds of Dead Birds Found outside High School.” The Times West Virginian [Fairmont] 30 Sept. 2008. Print.

Expressions of American Modernists

YHC: ENGL 2220

April 8, 2010

modern poets

Each author has a different object of focus, and their own ways of giving value to the object.  That is how a story is told, be it fiction or nonfiction, a poem or a five-hundred page novel. All authors place value in the art of life that surrounds them individually and they wish to convey these different images of life through many artistic forms. During the Modernist Movement in America many authors sought out new ways of writing and all experimented with the new techniques in order to express how they felt or what they see around them.  Authors wanted to express themselves through new found individuality and a sense of distrust of an absolute truth taught by man created institutions.  These expressions and techniques can range from Robert Frost’s use of Naturalism to explain his idea of the world having a grand design in even the smallest of objects, to Ezra Pound using imagism to instill a sense of love into a mundane object, to Claude McKay using his insight of the Harlem Renaissance to give face to a dancer when all other people only see her for her body.

In the poem “Design” by the naturalist Robert Frost, Frost wants to open up a new world to his reader by showing how the small things in nature can explain the larger picture of life.  He wants to use his artistry of writing to give the vision of nothing in the world happens without a reason.  Frost uses naturalism in his writing to detach himself from the subject focus and think of the flower, moth, and spider in a philosophical manner.  Frost set himself apart so that he could really see the object in front of him: “…a white heal-all, holding up a moth/… A snow-drop spider…” (Frost 1346).  He uses this technique to show that when we stand back do we realize the true rarity of simple everyday situations without the intervention of some designer; hence there must be some power, greater than life, which is making these situations happen.  Through this poem Frost also states the coldness of the world, another modernist writing tool, by saying that we have this creator but he/she/it doesn’t seem to care that an innocent creature, the moth, just died because of the placement of a deadly force, the spider.  He is basically saying that God, the master designer, will not help his creations even though He put them here in the first place: “…What brought the kindred spider to that height,/Then steered the white moth thither in the night?…”; it is not a coincidence that we are all on this Earth. (Frost 1346) Frost gives the off the mood of being alienation from God and breaks away from the social norm by giving this objection to the typical religious belief of a benevolent creator.  Frost also uses the iceberg effect in a limited way by not giving the reader all of the pieces to his word puzzle; he leaves out just enough to make the reader look for the reasoning behind a poem that seems almost too simple.  By looking at the diction and with objects of focus Frost purposely puts together certain images that are rare to find jointly in nature to give the disillusionment of there being no design to the world, and thusl stating that for every design there is a creator who is in control.  That feeling of no control causes the feeling of frustration and spiritual loneliness that many people feel when they realize the smallness of their lives when compared to the big picture.  By taking this approach in writing Frost helped kick off the Modernist Movement, and helped set a new standard of writing for a new generation of writers and readers.

In the imagist poem “In a Station at the Metro” by Ezra Pound, Pound becomes famous with his simple and clear diction.  Pound only used fourteen words to describe the feeling of being lost in a sea of “apparition of…faces in the crowd”; whereas, ironically, most poets would use the fourteen line sonnet to describe the same feeling of alienation in the metro station (Frost 1402).  By using these fourteen words, instead of fourteen lines, Pound is rejecting the outdated system of old rules by initiating new ones (i.e. instead of using lines, only use simple, clear words).  An imagist poem is a highly regarded technique that is meant to give a big picture with hardly any words; and Pound few words in this poem were mainly to describe the ghostly faces in the crowd at the station which gives an allusion of a mythical past that seems just barely tangible.  The images in this poem really do not fit well together in the last line: “…Petals on a wet, black bough.” (Pound 1402)  Taking a dainty word like “petals” and placing it next to “black bough” shows that Pound was placing beauty in something that many people would find unsightly.  Simply everything about this poem is the placement of the words, and not the words themselves.  By using placement of words to convey meaning instead of the words just meaning what they do Pound is separating his meaning from the overall context of his poem so the reader has to look at the poem as a whole and not at the words.  Pound then uses naturalism to separate himself from the “apparition” so that he can find the beauty in that “black bough” of a metro station.  Pound also, like Frost, uses the iceberg principle by giving the reader only the “tip of the iceberg”; allotting the reader room to put together the undertow of information given to them throughout the story.

For the Harlem poet Claude McKay and his poem “Harlem Dancer”, McKay got to use many other literary techniques that his white comrades in writing could not use.  Being part of the Harlem Renaissance McKay got to experience the heart and soul of jazz music and the poetry that was being written based on the music’s tempo.  He got to the heart of the African American movement in his poem of the “Harlem Dancer”; in this poem McKay wanted to express his sadness when he sees his people’s art being used as just a form of entertainment and not being seen for the deeper meaning that the artist intend it for.  The image is set up to show the majority of people only come for the show and not the artist who worked feverishly in order to make that show happen.  McKay used his personal experience of being both African American and Caucasian to use double consciousness to understand both his black brothers and his white comrades who both come to “devour” this performer.  McKay is also very overt in his writing and just says things as he sees and feels them instead of being overly symbolic.  He also was very realistic in this poem, and he gives a very real image of a Harlem dancer/singer performance and the audience’s reactions to her.  He described this dancer as a “falsely smiling face, / I knew her self was not in that place.” (McKay 1848)  McKay really illustrates how despairing this girl’s life is since she is an artist who is not taken seriously for her craft, and, though she is kept around for now because she “looks” good, she does not have a set future so she takes the jobs that she can get.  This poem is intriguing because the description of the girl’s face looking as though she “herself was not in that place” pulls the reader in even deeper into the story, even though it is the last line, because the reader wonders where this girl’s mind goes when she is singing; making this visual another iceberg technique since the reader only gets the tip of the story.

All of these authors have different topics of interest that they wish to speak about but they used some of the same literary tools to convey their overall meaning.  Each author would set himself apart from the subject, either by use of naturalism or realism, of their writing in order to better understand their subject.  To choose between the two tools means to either strike up a philosophical reasoning of human behavior, i.e. naturalism, or to use the tools of reportage and accurately represent the life of the person who is being studied. Also there is that modernist skill of using the iceberg effect in order to show that not everything that is seen on the surface is truth, and we must dig deeper to find the individuals’ heart and soul in the work.  The iceberg effect also never leaves the reader with any clear cut answers to the questions being addressed in some poems, or some poets just give enough information for the reader to draw out of the piece what they will.  Though many modernists had the same tools to use for their works, some poets would expand the movement and add in different elements that their life experience gave them to work with. Like McKay, many African American writers got to use a sense of double conscience in their works because they have experience working with people of different races and understand how to communicate with the different groups of people effectively.   However white authors also got out of their mold by experimenting with imagism poetry like Pound.  Though he only experimented with this technique for little of his overall work, he showed that it does not take a sonnet to say something that only needs a few words, and even then the writer doesn’t have to be blunt with his words.  Overall all of these poets had their own style of writing, even though some used some of the same tools for different subjects of writing, which was the greatest ideal that came out of the Modernist Movement.

Work Cited:

Frost, Robert. “Design”. The Heath Anthology of American Literature, Sixth Ed, Volume D, Modern Period 1910-1945. Lauter, Paul. New York. Wadsworth: Cengage Learning, 2010. pg 1346.

McKay, Claude. “The Harlem Dancer”. The Heath Anthology of American Literature, Sixth Ed, Volume D, Modern Period 1910-1945. Lauter, Paul. New York. Wadsworth: Cengage Learning, 2010. pg 1848.

Pound, Ezra. “In A Station at the Metro”. The Heath Anthology of American Literature, Sixth Ed, Volume D, Modern Period 1910-1945. Lauter, Paul. New York. Wadsworth: Cengage Learning, 2010. Pg 1402.

 

“Bass” to “Buns”: How Music Videos Affect the Feminist Movement

GSU: ENGL 3050

December 2014

No one can deny that music is pervasive within western culture. It gives people moments of freedom from work and stress and to just ‘Shake It Off.’ A huge part of the music industry of music is to make accompanying music videos to convey the meaning of the song or to make commentary about a social issue. Music videos give researchers a sample of culture from which they can study a community’s ideology that could affect the overarching culture. Some of these genre-communities from which they are studying include rap/hip-hop, pop, country/western, blues/R&B, and many more. All of these smaller genre-communities are based on what they, as a larger, more diverse culture, listen to or seek out on a normal basis. When people find a genre that perpetuates their personal values or their view of culture, they then subscribe to the ideology of the music community. These ideologies range from lifestyle choices, perception of the culture, and most notably sexual activity. Ideologies, which are reflective of both communities and overarching culture, change over time to reflect what is important to the masses, in particular adolescent masses, who are subscribing to these ideologies. With the combating ideologies of heteronormative femininity and the Feminist Movement, there is more of an emphasis on what is being shown of women in music communities. Women’s bodies have been objectified for many years in movies, television, advertisements, magazines, and especially in music videos. However, in 2014, more people are speaking up for feminist values for the equal representation of women and equal treatment of both men and women. Through this essay, I will be analyzing Meghan Trainor’s music video and song “All About that Bass” and Nicki Minaj’s music video and song “Anaconda.” Through a feminist analysis, there is evidence to prove the proclaimed ‘self-love’ song by Trainor is a front for more heteronormative treatment of women’s bodies whereas Minaj’s song gives, somewhat, more female empowerment. Though both videos do lend to more a sense of female love of self both fail to give a full message of female empowerment. Through critical analysis I will also examine how the rhetoric of false women empowerment can lead to a society that has a warped perception of female sexuality and thought process of a woman. This false empowerment leads to the video example of “Literally I Can’t” by the rappers Play-N-Skillz in which women are portrayed as objects for male sexual pleasure through Judith Butler’s concept of “to-be-looked-at-ness.” Without female empowerment men and women are subjected to ‘art piece[s]’ that show sexual and mental abuse toward women. This abuse affects our culture as a whole by reestablishing the patriarchal construct that men are superior to women and this abuse justifies rape culture.

Let’s begin with the changes of female beauty standards. The standard in a European white, heteronormative society would idealize white or pale women as forms of beauty and represent them through all forms of our culture. The ‘ideal’ of female beauty is to be naturally thin, small, and fragile looking; the ideal for women to strive for is to be an object for men to take care of and keep from breaking. It’s a porcelain doll mentality that women must look perfect.  Idealizing women’s beauty isn’t just in our culture as stated by psychology researcher, Maya Poran,

“It has been consistently found that women tend to focus on appearance more than men do, and women tend to view their bodies as objects, perceiving themselves on a part-by-part basis” (Poran 66).

No matter if women are striving to be curvy, thin, tall, or short there is always a social pressure to be more than what they are so they can also be seen as a desirable object. Many women who do not conform to these social ideals or pressures are ridiculed by other members of the culture until that woman falls back in line with the culture’s ideology of women. Poran continues to explain in her research on social comparison, that “[e]xperiences of the body are also highly influenced by the gender-orientation of the individual; the higher women are in feminine gender-role orientation, the lower their body esteem. High feminine gender-role orientation has also been found to be strongly related to the presence of eating disorders” (Poran 66). Her explanation is to show that, in American culture, men and women have been given their gendered roles from which they are expected to perform based on their cultural ideology. However, since there are more people voicing their concerns about gendering our culture’s children and forcing strict gendered stereotypes on to them, there has been a push by the public for ‘love-yourself’ from female music artists.

Trainor and Minaj, are popular 2014 artists and they are a sample of two popular genres: pop music and rap music. What’s more is that both of their songs have breached the top 50 of the Billboard Hot 100 list. (“Billboard Hot 100 Chart”). This list of 100 songs documents and keeps track of the most popular songs of the day based on how many times that song has been played on the radio, bought off iTunes, or how many copies of a CD has been bought or streamed. Essentially, these top songs are making the most money in our culture, proving that these songs are important because they are being sought out and paid for by millions of people. Since there is such a push for these songs, there is a cultural significance to understand the rhetoric within these songs and their videos; and because these two artists are women representing culture, they are important to examine to show what behavior is expected of women in this society.

   

Trainor’s song “All About that Bass,” was the summer song of 2014 releasing in June. It was promoted as the ‘feel-good-song’ of the summer that told women that they were perfect just the way they are already and they do not have to look the same way as a model on the cover of a magazine. Trainor, with a poppy, doo-wap tones, sings that she isn’t buying into magazines’ ideas that photo shopped women are perfect and that she is “[b]ringing booty back.” It’s true that women place themselves up to a standard that they cannot reasonably live up to. These overly perfected body images can be seem on magazines, TV, and music videos; these images affect women early on as stated by Beth Bella in her collaborative work, “The Impact of Thin Models in Music Videos on Adolescent Girls’ Body Dissatisfaction.” Bella states that,

“A key finding of the present study is that adolescent girls exposed to thin models in music videos show a significantly larger increase in body dissatisfaction from pre- to post-exposure in comparison to girls who had listened to the songs without visual input and girls in the baseline, word recall, intervention…” (Bella 143).

Trainor has a right to voice her anger at magazines and the ‘powers-that-be’ that make women and men feel inadequate about their size or for the way they look. Researcher Bella, with her group of adolescent girls, found that it didn’t matter the baseline self-esteem that these girls showed in the beginning. Every girl’s body-image was affected by seeing thin models being the object of affection when it comes to music videos (Bella 144). It’s great seeing a full-figured woman standing up for herself for this issue. The problem arises when Trainor brings up that she: “can shake it, shake it/Like I’m supposed to do/’Cause I got that boom boom that all the boys chase.” This verbiage implies that a woman with great self worth must flaunt herself in order to be happy, and that her self-worth is owned by the men who ‘chase’ her. It’s made more evident that men are still in control with the phrase, “Boys like a little more booty to hold at night.” These words assume that everyone is out to be wanted by someone else; though that is not untrue in most cases, it is better for a young woman or man to love her/himself first without needing to seek out the approval of another. The lyrics’ rhetoric is talking out the side of the mouth with itself because it is just trading one gaze for women to judge themselves by for another; in this case society to a man. This false empowerment servers this point made in Cara Wallis’ research for her essay: “Performing Gender: A Content Analysis of Gender Display in Music Videos.”

“These findings, unfortunately, are not surprising because music videos are a form of entertainment as well as a means of advertisement, and numerous studies have found stereotyped gender behavior in both. At the same time, as more female performers have claimed equality with men and have sought to break down gender stereotypes in the music industry, the degree of stereotyped gender display in music videos raises concern as to the impact women have actually had in shifting this very gendered terrain.” (Wallis 169)

Minaj’s song “Anaconda,” took a moment to understand if it is listened to without context of the video or details behind some of the lyrics. Released in August of 2014, this song became a popular cultural icon through its shocking music video and MTV’s Video Music Award performance. The problem with “Anaconda,” a routine theme with Minaj’s work, is that there is explicit imagery of many sexualized women along with lyrics that talk about a woman getting into relationships with drug dealers in order to get money. This video throughout depicts women in various sexually explicit positions throughout both performances onstage and in video. One ‘boy’ she sings about is Troy who was a ‘dope dealer’ in Detroit and Michael was a ‘Cocaine’ who liked motorcycles. Troy she wasn’t really serious about hence her calling him a ‘boy toy,’ urban meaning male whom you fool around sexually with. Each time Minaj talks about either of these men she states that she is “on some dumb shit,” urban meaning she was foolish or made a dumb decision while intoxicated.  Back to Troy and Michael do note that Minaj is singing about these men in past.   Neither of the men will ever mess with Minaj because she is able to ‘jab’ like Floyd ‘Mayweather’ whom she mentioned in the song, and she is even given the nickname ‘Nyquil’ by Michael saying that she can knock someone out. Problem with this rhetoric here is, though it is awesome to see a woman stand up for herself in a physical confrontation, there are better ways of dealing with issues than to resort to domestic violence. Minaj showed what her poor decisions got her: two guys she had to beat up. The problem here is that, even though it is awesome to show a strong woman who doesn’t take any crap from a man, it’s not necessary easy to gather that it is her meaning that a woman should take control of her own sexuality and realize when she has made a bad decision on who to sleep with. On the surface it appears that this is just a rap video about sex and drug use, but what it really equates to is that a woman has to realize that she must take her power back to own her sexuality and her choices.

Since Minaj is in the rap scene, she knows more than anyone that rap music is very explicit about drug use and aggressive heterosexual relationships. Where Bella had written on how thin models affect adolescent girls with body dissatisfaction, Shani Peterson wrote on the topic: “Images of Sexual Stereotypes in Rap Videos and the Health of African American Female Adolescents.” Blatant use of alcohol and ‘glamorized depictions’ of drug use is often paired with sexual situations that normalize these practices (Peterson 1162). This has had horrible implications on adolescents who are exposed to this kind of behavior; such as acting out in any way that could lead to drug use, jail time, or dropping out of school. My take on Minaj’s rap is that she is a woman who has lived in this culture for so long that she knows how to speak the language, so to speak, to young, black adolescents about getting out of a dumb situation no matter how glamorized the lifestyle or clothes are while in that lifestyle. It is my hope that more women and young girls will start paying attention to the songs that are huge in culture because some of the more ‘empowering’ songs are not what we always think they are. By that point, if people pay attention to the lyrics and video context of their favorite songs, maybe then  that will help change Peterson’s earlier findings of girls acting out stereotypical images that they see on the screen, but do pay attention to the words that they are singing along to in an effort to empower themselves (Peterson 1163).

The Trainor video itself is very colorful with everyone wearing bright pastels and pinks and blues. The rooms is a solid color of pink with no windows to look outside. Everyone is smiling and having fun letting go and finally acting like themselves because they want to ‘shake it’ without anyone patronizing them. In the video there are two little girls who are playing house and Trainor takes the part of the Barbie Doll, even though she claims she’ll never be one, who is having dinner with her ‘Ken.’ It is interesting that for this video that they choose to keep up with the classic ‘housewife’ theme. It’s as though they couldn’t shove the idea of heteronormativity into viewer’s heads enough that they also had to play house. This idea of men being the ones in power through this video is shown through both the ‘Ken’ doll and the dancing man. ‘Ken,’ or what I have likened him to, is only there to look at Trainor while she dances and does what she is ‘supposed to do.’ From what I have gathered through this video, all Trainor ‘has’ to do is make the ‘Ken’ smile. Even if she forcing him to do it.  The ‘Ken’ is given more power by the dancing man in the background; this is because, based on the assumption this man is gay or of the queer community, everyone in this video is out to seek ‘Ken’s’ approval. Everyone in this video wants the approval and love of a man, and in ‘Ken’s’ case, a white man. If that isn’t a blatant image of white, patriarchal, heteronormative ideology, then I don’t know what is.

The location with Minaj’s song is in the rain-forest and the women are shown to be animalistic Amazonians. They are shown as sexualized beings that are wanted by men. The women are in a hot area so their skin is glistening with sweat (more like misted water, but the effect is the same), they are in next to no clothing, they are gyrating their bottoms, they are working out, they are sexually appealing women. The only time a man is shown on screen with Minaj is when she is giving a lap dance to the singer Drake. In this place, it is normally seen as men in the power position because they don’t have to do anything but sit and watch, however the opposite is the truer statement. It is the one performing the ‘sexual’ act that has the power, which is Minaj. She is doing what she wants and is getting a thrill out of having this sexual power over men; the second Drake does something she doesn’t like she smacks his hand and walks away. Oddly enough, the only time Minaj is with a man is the only time that she is in a room that isn’t connected to the outside world; there are no windows and it’s made to look like a club. At all other points in the song she is outside or in a room with windows. These windows, normally being a western symbol for a way to the outside world, represent the freedom that the person within these situations has for themselves. Trainor is stuck in her box, because she is only interested in a boy finding her sexually appealing. Whereas Minaj has realized that she is worth being out there in the ‘world of men’ so to speak, however she does make poor decisions that she has to backtrack from.

One problem that both Nicki Minaj and Meghan Trainor have with their rhetoric in aim of female and self-empowerment is that they both tear down the ‘Skinny Bitches.’ This urban term is used to talk about a woman who is skinny without trying and, because she doesn’t have to suffer painful workouts or she can eat whatever she wants, it’s okay to hate her. This is the biggest problem with this ‘self love’ movement, because it is moving judgment of one body shape, or ‘body shaming,’ to another without addressing that people shouldn’t be body shaming at all. Though both songs sing loud and proud about their female empowerment, they still are shaming other types of women for not conforming to their new ideal of beauty. Be that in a ‘playful way,’ that is not very playful at all, like Trainor where she says, ‘Go ahead and tell them skinny bitches that/No, I’m just playing. I know you think you’re fat.’ To Minaj saying, “Fuck those skinny bitches,/Fuck those skinny bitches in the club/I wanna see all the big fat ass bitches in the motherfucking club, fuck you if you skinny/bitches. What?” Minaj isn’t apologetic about her distaste of the ‘thin ideal,’ but at least she doesn’t insinuate that all women think they’re fat like Trainor. This is a neglect of different types of women; different types of women who don’t want a boy to hold them at night, who are thin, who don’t work out, or who don’t play house. Ignoring these women and ridiculing them is a rude dismissal of what these women say they really stand for in being a feminist or projecting feminist ideals.

The purpose of protecting those ideals, being that feminist ideals are meant to lead to equality,  is to perpetuate a culture of, ideally, equality and understanding over separation and forced sexualization of men and women. In the video of “Literally I Can’t” the artists Play-N-Skillz, these are two brothers who rap together (see the citation page below for more detail), about the cliche of women of sororities telling men that they can’t do what is asked of them because of their obligation to the sisterhood. Any ideas that may be gathered from this video about the identification of sexual problems in our culture have been washed off the producers hands, so to speak, by their introduction to the video:

“The following is a satirical video based on Sororities/Fraternities and the cliche ‘Literally I Can’t.’ This content is in no way to be interpreted negative towards any groups of people. It is an art piece and it shall be taken as such.” (Salinas)

This statement can be taken as a form of ‘exit strategy’ if the producers were to be sued for taking on the image of a fraternity while our society has been dealing with many outcries over sexual assaults on campuses across the United States. Due to the sensitive nature of the news viewing audience toward rape culture the producers have woven this statement in to create their ‘art piece.’ By the way of making this statement they are in essence saying that they don’t want to sound bigoted or heartless, but here’s our music video of men yelling at women for not complying with their sexual wishes for the women to pole-dance or to make-out with other women.

The video goes on to show that the men of the frat party are sick of the women’s acclamations of being ‘good girls’ and yells at them to ‘Shut the fuck up.’ Eventually, one by one, each of the women break down and begin to party. Proving the point of the men telling the women that they need to shut up and party like they, the men, want them to in order to fully enjoy themselves. It does appear that they women are happy to be partying with the men, but this is only after the men intimidated the women by rushing at them in groups and yelling at them even after the women tell them repeatedly that they ‘can’t.’ By the women eventually breaking down to ‘have fun’ they have proven the point that just because a woman says ‘no’ she may want to say ‘yes,’ which is a huge component of rape culture where ‘no’ doesn’t mean ‘no.’

This video undermines feminist equality on several fronts on parts of both the fraternity and the sorority. The sorority sisters perpetuate the idea that women are held to a standard that they are to remain ‘good’ or ‘pure’ in order to be good women; they wear white and pink outfits to show their ‘girly’ and ‘pure’ nature. Repeatedly telling the men and women around them that they ‘can’t’ begs the question: Why can’t they? Is it their obligation to the sorority, to societal standards on women, or to themselves that they ‘can’t’ do what they appear to enjoy doing once they allow themselves to do what they ‘can’t.’ If they enjoy it why can’t they and by whose authority that they can’t do what they wish with their bodies. These terms of ‘I can’t’ are reinforced by the other women saying ‘EW’ that what is being asked of them is disgusting and that the women should refrain from taking part in base activities; this tells viewers that we will be judged by our peers. It would be more empowering for them to say that they will not or won’t do what is being asked of them by the fraternity brothers. The statement of ‘I won’t’ over ‘I can’t’ gives the speaker their own authority to control what happens to their body. That being said the men also intensify the situation by yelling and getting into the personal space of the sorority sisters.

These actions of the fraternity appear to be the same as really agressive ‘cat calling.’ With this reflection on real life occurrences in women’s lives let us take a look at the performers of this video, the men. The performers Play-N-Skillz perform the ‘nice guy’ behaviors of asking these ‘stuck up,’ but otherwise attractive, women to drink and party with them. When the women refuse with their course of ‘I can’t’ and ‘EW’ the performer Lil Jon steps yells at them, ‘Oh my God! Shut the fuck up!’ This performance can be summed up from the performer Redfoo’s lyrics: “I said jump on the poll/I didn’t mean your opinion…I’m tryna see what you got/Not tryna hear what you think.” These men, or by their characters ‘fraternity brothers,’ go out of their way to talk about their own sexual pleasure by ordering the women to: ‘Bounce on the pogo/Jump on the jack hammer,’ ‘I’ll tweet about it…And you could be winnin,’ ‘You’re booty in my hand is my new motto,’ and ‘Put your lips on my bottle.’ These are just a handful of lines used in this song that show that the sexual performance by these women will lead to the men’s sexual pleasure, and by actively making the women behave in accordance to what they want the men are happy. It does appear that the women are happy too, but that connection to becoming submissive to men that are forcing themselves onto them is a dangerous bolstering of rape culture and leads to justifying that women get raped and that is normal.

In conclusion, through the lack of upholding of feminist ideology in favor of perpetuating heteronormative ideology that already is in place in our society, I propose that singers and artists like Meghan Trainor and Nicki Minaj should aim to be more inclusive with women no matter their body shape. By getting more women included to their circle of influence, there will be more women to act out what they are being shown through their music videos. This is in hopes that women audience members will learn to accept themselves, accept one another, and to take care of themselves. Through the feminist movement, women should learn that everyone should be equal and strong in their own right no matter what society has dictated them to be based on their genitalia. Both women do have great points about embracing what you are born with and standing up for yourself to get out of a bad situation. However, with the lack of acknowledgement that self-love does not depend on another person and the ‘skinny’ women are all ‘bitches’ neither are great representatives of the feminist movement, yet. If they continue down this path of false female empowerment we can expect to see more gender discrimination that we have today and an intensifying of rape culture’s effect on adolescent age viewers.

Work Cited:

Bella, Beth T., Rebecca Lawton, and Helga Dittmar. “The Impact of Thin Models in Music Videos on Adolescent Girls’ Body Dissatisfaction.” Body Image 4. (2007): 137–145. Science Direct. Elsevier. Web. 11 Nov. 2014.

“Billboard Hot 100 Chart.” Billboard.com. Billboard. Web. 07 Dec. 2014. <http://www.billboard.com/charts/hot-100>.

Minaj, Nicki. “Anaconda.” YouTube. YouTube, 19 Aug. 2014. Web. 11 Nov. 2014. <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LDZX4ooRsWs>.

Peterson, Shani H., Gina M. Wingood, Ralph J. DiClemente, Kathy Harrington, and Susan Davies. “Images of Sexual Stereotypes in Rap Videos and the Health of African American Female Adolescents.” Journal of Women’s Health 16.8 (2007): 1157-164. Mary Ann Liebert Inc. Web. 11 Nov. 2014.

Poran, Maya A. “Denying Diversity: Perceptions Of Beauty And Social Comparison Processes Among Latina, Black, And White Women.” Sex Roles 47.1-2 (2002): 65-81. PsycINFO. Web. 7 Dec. 2014.

Salinas, Juan ‘Play,’ Oscar ‘Skillz’ Salinas, Stefan ‘Redfoo’ Kendal Gordy, Jonathan ‘Lil Jon’ Smith, and Enertia Mcfly. “Literally I Can’t.” YouTube. YouTube, 30 Oct. 2014. Web. 5 Dec. 2014. <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PC52toizz8U>

Trainor, Meghan. “All About That Bass.” YouTube. YouTube, 11 June 2014. Web. 11 Nov. 2014. <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7PCkvCPvDXk>.

Wallis, Cara. “Performing Gender: A Content Analysis of Gender Display in Music Videos.”Sex Roles 64.3-4 (2011): 160-72. Springer Links. Springer. Web. 11 Nov. 2014.