So last week we had a peer review session for the rough draft of the Visual Analysis. In my high school, we would often do peer review sessions similar to this one. However, this one was not as useful. I think it was because of Charles Grimm, our teacher @GrimmProspects, gave the students a guideline on things to look for. While this could be useful for if they could not find any content to criticize, I felt as though I got the same kind of feedback from both people. I feel as though they stuck strictly to the guidelines and didn’t focus on anything relating to content or structure. Comparatively, the peer review sessions that I had in high school were better for tips on what to do and what not to do.

Thanks for reading, heres a meme.