Built Environment Draft III

Problems:

  1. There are a lot of abandoned buildings in certain parts of Atlanta, especially as people move away from or are discouraged from visiting certain areas (Underground Atlanta, for example or the neighborhoods surrounding Turner Field/any gentrifying neighborhood). This creates a lot of disparity and separation between groups socially, politically, and economically. There has been an increase in crime around areas like Underground Atlanta. Poorer neighborhoods have less say politically over what happens to their property. There is a clear cultural gap between people living in impoverished neighborhoods and on the street and those who live in nicer areas. The solution is to bring new life into these areas by improving them. But how can that be done?
  2. Urban sprawl. The city is growing in size too quickly, and that can cause a whole multitude of problems, one of which is pollution. Isn’t there a better way to use our land and resources to their full potential?

The Solution:

Adaptive reuse is a viable solution for the problems listed above. It saves money on construction costs (how much?), it’s better for the environment by eliminating waste and the resources used that would otherwise be used to operate machinery (specific examples), it preserves the  character of historic areas and buildings if done correctly (again, specific examples), it reduces urban sprawl by making use of land that would otherwise be abandoned and allotting that space for other buildings, and it promotes sustainable development,

Drawbacks to the Proposed Solution:

As long as the building is sound and the layout and amount of space are appropriate for the business (or whatever else) to install itself there, there are very few draw backs to adapting a building for reuse. One main concern, however, is the lack of efficiency of old buildings, which many developers say outweigh the cost of building a new structures (is their reasoning sound, though?). Whatever the case, these are issues that can be solved easily by doing things like adding insulation, and updating fixtures and appliances like air conditioning units (find additional sources to support). Another (sometime legitimate) concern of the reusing old buildings are unexpected faults in the structure. However, if properly examined prior to purchasing, most of these issues can be sussed-out and resolved.

The Reason:

(How did the built environment become this way?) There are many reasons and explanations as to how the built environment in Atlanta developed the way it did.

  • Industries dying out and leaving buildings empty
  • Failing businesses

What is Adaptive Reuse? 

In basic terms, adaptive reuse is the redevelopment of an old building for a purpose other than the originally intended use. Developers are increasingly considering adaptive reuse to deliver projects with authenticity and a more attractive cost basis (Atlanta Business Chronicle).

Older buildings represent an important aesthetic, cultural and economic resource—as well as a non-renewable one. Yet dozens, and perhaps hundreds, of historic buildings have been demolished over the past decades largely because owners, bankers and developers have argued that the costs of renovating and adapting these buildings for new uses is too high. Demolition of the existing buildings and replacement with new structures, the story goes, is the only way for investors to make a reasonable profit from the use of the land. Some even go as far as asserting that new-build is always more economical, renovation universally more expensive. At the same time reputable developers, architects and investors seem to be able to complete exciting and profitable projects which feature innovative building renovation. Many older buildings are not only suitable for new uses but often become key sites in renewal schemes. Some developers argue that reusing older buildings always represents a financial advantage. (“Does Adaptive Reuse Pay?”) Whatever the case, reputable design firms like Perkins and Will have been reinventing existing buildings for new uses. In fact, their Atlanta office, re-purposed as a “living laboratory and educational tool for sustainable design,” was adapted from an old office structure.   (Perkins and Will website).

Beyond cost savings, the neighborhoods surrounding adaptive reuse projects typically feature a unique character and authenticity. They are often close to public attractions, and most importantly, they provide end users with distinctive urban cultural and social experiences. As more people regain a taste for urban living and move from suburbs back into redeveloped cities, many are attracted to buildings that maintain historical elements and character, features that cannot be built from the ground up. Due to the uniqueness of these places, they often command above market rents. (Atlanta Business Chronicle)

Built Environment Analysis Draft II

Problems:

  1. There are a lot of abandoned buildings in certain parts of Atlanta, especially as people move away from or are discouraged from visiting certain areas (Underground Atlanta, for example or the neighborhoods surrounding Turner Field/any gentrifying neighborhood). This creates a lot of disparity and separation between groups socially, politically, and economically. There has been an increase in crime around areas like Underground Atlanta. Poorer neighborhoods have less say politically over what happens to their property. There is a clear cultural gap between people living in impoverished neighborhoods and on the street and those who live in nicer areas. The solution is to bring new life into these areas by improving them. But how can that be done?
  2. Urban sprawl. The city is growing in size too quickly, and that can cause a whole multitude of problems, one of which is pollution. Isn’t there a better way to use our land and resources to their full potential?

The Solution:

Adaptive reuse is a viable solution for the problems listed above. It saves money on construction costs (how much?), it’s better for the environment by eliminating waste and the resources used that would otherwise be used to operate machinery (specific examples), it preserves the  character of historic areas and buildings if done correctly (again, specific examples), it reduces urban sprawl by making use of land that would otherwise be abandoned and allotting that space for other buildings, and it promotes sustainable development,

Drawbacks to the Proposed Solution:

As long as the building is sound and the layout and amount of space are appropriate for the business (or whatever else) to install itself there, there are very few draw backs to adapting a building for reuse. One main concern, however, is the lack of efficiency of old buildings, which many developers say outweigh the cost of building a new structures (is their reasoning sound, though?). Whatever the case, these are issues that can be solved easily by doing things like adding insulation, and updating fixtures and appliances like air conditioning units (find additional sources to support). Another (sometime legitimate) concern of the reusing old buildings are unexpected faults in the structure. However, if properly examined prior to purchasing, most of these issues can be sussed-out and resolved.

The Reason:

(How did the built environment become this way?) There are many reasons and explanations as to how the built environment in Atlanta developed the way it did.

  • Industries dying out and leaving buildings empty
  • Failing businesses

What is Adaptive Reuse? 

In basic terms, adaptive reuse is the redevelopment of an old building for a purpose other than the originally intended use. Developers are increasingly considering adaptive reuse to deliver projects with authenticity and a more attractive cost basis (Atlanta Business Chronicle).

Older buildings represent an important aesthetic, cultural and economic resource—as well as a non-renewable one. Yet dozens, and perhaps hundreds, of historic buildings have been demolished over the past decades largely because owners, bankers and developers have argued that the costs of renovating and adapting these buildings for new uses is too high. Demolition of the existing buildings and replacement with new structures, the story goes, is the only way for investors to make a reasonable profit from the use of the land. Some even go as far as asserting that new-build is always more economical, renovation universally more expensive. At the same time reputable developers, architects and investors seem to be able to complete exciting and profitable projects which feature innovative building renovation. Many older buildings are not only suitable for new uses but often become key sites in renewal schemes. Some developers argue that reusing older buildings always represents a financial advantage. (“Does Adaptive Reuse Pay?”) Whatever the case, reputable design firms like Perkins and Will have been reinventing existing buildings for new uses. In fact, their Atlanta office, re-purposed as a “living laboratory and educational tool for sustainable design,” was adapted from an old office structure.   (Perkins and Will website).

Beyond cost savings, the neighborhoods surrounding adaptive reuse projects typically feature a unique character and authenticity. They are often close to public attractions, and most importantly, they provide end users with distinctive urban cultural and social experiences. As more people regain a taste for urban living and move from suburbs back into redeveloped cities, many are attracted to buildings that maintain historical elements and character, features that cannot be built from the ground up. Due to the uniqueness of these places, they often command above market rents. (Atlanta Business Chronicle)

 

A Monument to Advancement: Atlanta City Hall

 

img_2005
Atlanta City Hall, 2016

Right across the street from the Georgia State Capitol, Atlanta City Hall has undergone a transformation. The addition of trees and green space surrounding the City Hall is not the only change the city of Atlanta has undergone since the government building opened in 1930. In 1989, a new annex was added to the building as well. As is, the structure,

atlanta-city-hall-1967
Atlanta City Hall, 1967

located on Mitchell Street, “looks like a city hall,” as noted by one of my fellow observers. The adjacent blocks are dominated by government buildings and historic churches, many of which have played major roles in shaping the built environment over the decades.

The third and longest occupied of Atlanta’s city halls, the current city hall was built as a monument to advancement as Atlanta settled into its role as the hub of business and commerce of the South. Today it houses meetings, offices, and public services. The outside is almost serene in its beauty with statues and lush grass, and the block is quiet during the afternoon. Across the street, a couple of students hang are standing in front of the pizza restaurant, and a few homeless people sit on the stone wall beside Trinity United Methodist Church, an organization that was a key player in the development of the area. Thimg_2027e inside is equally quiet. As I chatted with a security guard about obtaining permission to takeimg_2023 photos, I was astounded by the elegance of the lobby. Ornate pillars held up the gilded ceilings and images of phoenixes, the symbol of Atlanta, emblazoned every appropriate surface. In 1966, Mayor Ivan Allen Jr. brought both national football and baseball teams to Atlanta, and the lobby showcases the first two game balls from each sport. Their display is a symbol of the economic prosperity introduced by one of Atlanta’s most popular and well-known mayors.

img_2013
Trinity Street Annex, Interior

Shorty after the addition of the annex in 1989, the need for more parking for additional employees sparked some controversy. For economic reason, the City of Atlanta wanted to hire private developers to construct parking garages over the two existing parking lots and install mixed income housing developments in the area surrounding City Hall. Central Atlanta Progress (CAP), a downtown civic group, protested. I observed a handful of parallel parking spaces in front of the building, and an apartment complex across the street, along with the pizza restaurant and a few other businesses. There appears to have been a compromise between the two proposals for parking–one still exists while the other was converted into retail space and apartments. This area, like Atlanta, is constantly developing in order to maximize economic benefit, and City Hall is undoubtedly the hub of all such decisions. 

Fairlie-Poplar: The Fireproof District

img_1911
Fairlie-Poplar Sign

If you’ve ever made the trek to Aderhold, you might have stumbled upon a gem without even realizing it. Nestled into the northwestern edge of Georgia State’s campus, were it not for the eclectic signs proclaiming, “Fairlie-Poplar Historic District,” I might have overlooked it myself.  Once lauded as Atlanta’s “fire-proof” business district, the area is densely populated with historic office buildings and is the site of many former hotels. It is located between the Peachtree Center and Five Points Marta stations, making the former business hub extremely accessible by public transportation. On an autumn day, the district hums with a gentle sort of life as the wind sweeps past re-purposed buildings, offices, and restaurants. 

Although the border is contested, the district is officially bounded by Peachtree, Luckie, Cone, and Marietta Streets, but stretches a bit further in each cardinal direction. The internal streets include Fairlie, Poplar, Walton, and Broad Streets.

Once a hub of business and commerce, the district has condominiums for rent, several restaurants, and even Georgia State classroom buildings. The area is a seamless blend of old and new–a number of old buildings have been adapted for reuse, including the Flat Iron building, one of the first “skyscrapers” in the city of Atlanta. The construction of buildings like these signaled a shift in construction. Instead of wood, the buildings were made of steel and concrete, making them “fireproof.” Although very strong, many were skeptical of the new building material. In an attempt to reassure businesses and encourage them to use new office spaces, features with no use, like steel “reinforcement” beams were added to buildings, and remnants of these can be seen around Fairlie-Poplar. The Helen Aderhold Learning Center, one of Georgia State’s classroom buildings, although constructed in the 2000s, is located across from the Flat Iron Building and imitates the concrete and steel style of the surrounding buildings, blending in with ease.

The streets, constructed for foot and horse drawn carriage traffic, are narrow. While I was walking, I encountered such traffic in front of the Healey building, a lovely office building that has since been re-purposed as condominiums.

The district is also home to a number of memorials for city figures, such as Henry Grady, whose statue sits in the middle of the Marietta Street Island, Margret Mitchel, whose dedicated square sits just outside the official boundary of the district, and Barbara Asher, who also has a statue and square dedicated to her. It is clear Fairlie-Poplar has made an effort to maintain city culture. Outside the Candler Building at the corner of Peachtree and Williams Streets, I witnessed a protest, which, in my opinion, is a testament to the lively cultural diversity of both Atlanta and this district. 

Healey Building

The Healey Building is located at 57 Forsyth Street and features neo-gothic pillars at the stone front of the building. As observed, a horse drawn carriage pulled past the front of the building. Although not featured, the atrium of this building is grand and elaborate in its construction. Originally an office space, the building has been converted into condos. The downstairs offices remain, but they are nearly all empty, as are the retail spaces. The building is quiet, save for the adjoining coffee shop, and were it located anywhere other than the Fairlie-Poplar District, both its interior and exterior beauty would be unbeatable.

Fairlie-Poplar Signs

img_1911img_1904img_1941

Made of what appears to be metal and concrete, these Fairlie-Poplar signs are scattered about the district and feature what I can only assume to be characteristics or attractions of the area. Although I looked around for corresponding businesses or buildings, I didn’t find anything that matched the signs. I inferred that the tea set represented dining and restaurants, the jester entertainment, and the violins music, all of which can be found in some form in the Fairlie-Poplar District.

Barbara Asher Square

img_1922img_1923

img_1924

Barbara Asher Square is located off Marietta Street and directly behind the Five Points Marta station and is at the edge of what I defined as the Fairlie-Poplar District. The area, which feeds into the main part of Fairlie-Poplar, was bustling, aided by the business of a couple of street kiosks and McDonald’s on the corner and those exiting the train station. The statue of Barbara Asher, a prominent Atlanta figure who is responsible for the zoning of Fairlie-Poplar, is located on a strip of the Marietta greenway.

 

Henry Grady Statue at the Marietta Street Island

img_1953img_1954

The Marietta Street Island is a strip of greenspace that runs along, you guessed it, Marietta Street. It serves as a median between the two sides of the busy street. It’s a little bit surreal to stand in the middle of Atlanta traffic, in the middle of the road, no less. The Henry Grady statue, is near the intersection of Forsyth and Marietta and designates the junction “Henry Grady Square.” The statue, as stated by the plaque, has been there since late 1929.

This Google Street View provides a full shot of the area.